Nuwer M R
Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Jan;5(1):45-85.
The results of many studies using quantitative EEG techniques in clinical settings have been published. Those reports are reviewed here, with emphasis on those that used EEG frequency analysis and topographic mapping. In cerebrovascular disease, these methods can confirm the existence of lesions that are too mild to show up on routine EEG or too mild or too early to show up on computed tomography. The results correlate well with cerebral blood flow studies. These EEG tests can be done continuously in an intensive care unit or operating room. However, exact localization ability is inferior to that seen using traditional neuroimaging tests. In epilepsy, quantitative EEG techniques have found subtle degrees of background EEG changes near epileptic foci. Other methods can quantify epileptic spikes in useful ways and can indicate which region is driving other regions during seizures. Quantification is also useful for measuring drug effects when drugs (such as thiopental) are given deliberately to provoke acute EEG changes. Other measurements of drug effects may become useful in the future. In patients with mass lesions and metabolic encephalopathies, quantitative EEG changes do occur, and some of these correlate with the clinical state. However, in the latter settings, the clinical advantages for patient care are not yet clear, especially in comparison to available neuro-imaging studies and other routine medical tests. For dementia, quantitative EEG techniques are being developed. Some of these tests are accurate in moderately or severely demented patients, but there is still poor accuracy for early or borderline cases. For dyslexia, schizophrenia, and depression, there is a considerable volume of research reports but still no consensus about how to use quantitative EEG tests for care of individual patients. These tests require substantial user expertise in EEG. At present, these tests should be viewed as adjunctive to traditional EEG testing: such routine EEG testing should serve as the foundation for any clinical use of quantitative EEG tools.
许多在临床环境中使用定量脑电图技术的研究结果已经发表。在此对这些报告进行综述,重点关注那些使用脑电图频率分析和地形图绘制的研究。在脑血管疾病中,这些方法可以证实存在一些病变,这些病变过于轻微以至于在常规脑电图上无法显示,或者过于轻微或出现得太早以至于在计算机断层扫描上无法显示。其结果与脑血流研究结果相关性良好。这些脑电图测试可以在重症监护病房或手术室中连续进行。然而,其精确的定位能力不如传统神经影像学测试。在癫痫方面,定量脑电图技术已经发现癫痫病灶附近脑电图背景存在细微程度的变化。其他方法可以以有用的方式量化癫痫棘波,并且可以指出在癫痫发作期间哪个区域驱动其他区域。当故意给予药物(如硫喷妥钠)以引发急性脑电图变化时,量化对于测量药物效果也很有用。药物效果的其他测量方法在未来可能会变得有用。在有占位性病变和代谢性脑病的患者中,确实会出现定量脑电图变化,其中一些与临床状态相关。然而,在后一种情况下,对患者护理的临床优势尚不清楚,特别是与现有的神经影像学研究和其他常规医学检查相比。对于痴呆症,定量脑电图技术正在开发中。其中一些测试在中度或重度痴呆患者中是准确的,但对于早期或临界病例,准确性仍然很差。对于诵读困难、精神分裂症和抑郁症,有大量的研究报告,但对于如何将定量脑电图测试用于个体患者的护理仍未达成共识。这些测试需要脑电图方面大量的用户专业知识。目前,这些测试应被视为传统脑电图测试的辅助手段:这种常规脑电图测试应作为定量脑电图工具任何临床应用的基础。