McDonald V, Lynch S, Eskalen A
Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, 92521.
Plant Dis. 2009 Sep;93(9):967. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-9-0967B.
In 1953, branch cankers on California avocado (Persea americana Mill.) trees were attributed to a Botryosphaeria anamorph, Dothiorella gregaria (teleomorph B. ribis) (2), and the disease was known as Dothiorella canker. Since this time, it has been suggested that this fungus should probably be classified as Fusicoccum aesculi Corda (teleomorph B. dothidea) (3). To our knowledge, B. dothidea is the only reported Botryosphaeriaceae species causing Dothiorella canker on avocado in California. Between the summer of 2008 and the winter of 2009, five trees from each of eight avocado orchards in five counties (San Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, and San Luis Obispo) were surveyed for Dothiorella canker symptoms to verify the associated Botryosphaeriaceae species. Typical Dothiorella canker symptoms observed included darkened and friable bark with a dried, white, powdery exudate. Underneath the bark, cankers were variable in shape and some penetrated into the heartwood. Small sections of tissue (0.5 cm) were excised from two to four separate cankers per tree and placed onto potato dextrose agar amended with tetracycline (0.01%) (PDA-tet). The most frequently isolated fungi, based on general growth pattern, speed, and colony color, were in the Botryosphaeriaceae with the following percent recovery by county: Riverside-40 and 100% (site 1 and 2, respectively); San Diego-60% (site 3); Ventura-42 and 53% (site 4 and 5, respectively); Santa Barbara-33% (site 6); and San Luis Obispo-32 and 60% (site 7 and 8, respectively). Pycnidia of Botryosphaeriaceae species were also observed on old diseased avocado tree branches. Sequenced rDNA fragments (ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2, amplified with ITS4 and ITS5 primers) were compared with sequences deposited in GenBank. Four different Botryosphaeriaceae species were identified and included Neofusicoccum australe, B. dothidea, N. luteum, and N. parvum, with species nomenclature based on the work of Crous et al. (1). Pathogenicity tests were conducted in the greenhouse on 1-year-old avocado seedlings, cv. Hass, with one randomly chosen isolate from each of the Botryosphaeriaceae species noted above. Four replicate seedlings were stem-wound inoculated with a mycelial plug and covered with Parafilm. Sterile PDA plugs were applied to four seedlings as a control. Over a period of 3 to 6 months, seedlings were assessed for disease symptoms that included browning of leaf edges and shoot dieback. Mean vascular lesion lengths on stems were 64, 66, 64, and 18 mm for B. dothidea, N. parvum, N. luteum, and N. australe, respectively. Each fungal isolate was consistently reisolated from inoculated seedlings, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates. To our knowledge, this is the first report of N. australe, N. luteum, and N. parvum recovered from branch cankers on avocado in California. These results are significant because Botryosphaeriaceae canker pathogens are known to enter the host plant through fresh wounds (pruning, frost, and mechanical). With high-density planting becoming more common, which requires intensive pruning, the transmission rate of these pathogens could increase in California avocado groves. References: (1) P. W. Crous et al. Stud. Mycol. 55:235, 2006. (2) F. F. Halma and G. A. Zentmyer. Calif. Avocado Soc. Yearb. 38:156, 1953. (3) W. F. T. Hartill and K. R. Everett. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 30:249, 2002.
1953年,加利福尼亚州鳄梨树(Persea americana Mill.)上的枝条溃疡病被归因于一种葡萄座腔菌的无性型,即聚生小穴壳菌(有性型为B. ribis)(2),该病被称为小穴壳菌溃疡病。从那时起,有人提出这种真菌可能应归类为七叶树壳梭孢菌(Corda)(有性型为B. dothidea)(3)。据我们所知,B. dothidea是加利福尼亚州报道的唯一一种在鳄梨上引起小穴壳菌溃疡病的葡萄座腔菌科物种。在2008年夏季至2009年冬季期间,对五个县(圣地亚哥、里弗赛德、文图拉、圣巴巴拉和圣路易斯奥比斯波)八个鳄梨园中的每园五棵树进行了小穴壳菌溃疡病症状调查,以核实相关的葡萄座腔菌科物种。观察到的典型小穴壳菌溃疡病症状包括树皮变黑且易碎,带有干燥、白色、粉状渗出物。在树皮下方,溃疡形状各异,有些深入到心材中。从每棵树的两到四个不同溃疡处切取小块组织(0.5厘米),置于添加了四环素(0.01%)的马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂(PDA - tet)上。根据一般生长模式、速度和菌落颜色,最常分离出的真菌属于葡萄座腔菌科,各县的回收率如下:里弗赛德 - 40%和100%(分别为第1和第2个地点);圣地亚哥 - 60%(第3个地点);文图拉 - 42%和53%(分别为第4和第5个地点);圣巴巴拉 - 33%(第6个地点);圣路易斯奥比斯波 - 32%和60%(分别为第7和第8个地点)。在老的患病鳄梨树树枝上也观察到了葡萄座腔菌科物种的分生孢子器。将测序的核糖体DNA片段(ITS1、5.8S rDNA、ITS2,用ITS4和ITS5引物扩增)与GenBank中保存的序列进行比较。鉴定出四种不同的葡萄座腔菌科物种,包括澳大利亚新壳梭孢菌、B. dothidea、N. luteum和N. parvum,物种命名基于Crous等人(1)的研究。在温室中对1年生哈斯品种鳄梨幼苗进行了致病性测试,从上述每个葡萄座腔菌科物种中随机选取一个分离株。四株重复的幼苗用菌丝块进行茎部创伤接种,并用Parafilm覆盖。将无菌PDA块应用于四株幼苗作为对照。在3至6个月的时间内,对幼苗的病害症状进行评估,包括叶边缘褐变和嫩梢枯死。对于B. dothidea、N. parvum、N. luteum和N. australe,茎上的平均维管束病变长度分别为64、66、64和18毫米。每个真菌分离株都能从接种的幼苗中持续重新分离出来,从而满足了柯赫氏法则。据我们所知,这是首次报道从加利福尼亚州鳄梨树枝溃疡病中分离出澳大利亚新壳梭孢菌、N. luteum和N. parvum。这些结果意义重大,因为已知葡萄座腔菌科溃疡病病原菌通过新鲜伤口(修剪、霜冻和机械损伤)进入寄主植物。随着高密度种植越来越普遍,这需要密集修剪,这些病原菌在加利福尼亚州鳄梨园中的传播率可能会增加。参考文献:(1)P. W. Crous等人,《真菌学研究》55:235,2006年。(2)F. F. Halma和G. A. Zentmyer,《加利福尼亚鳄梨协会年报》38:156,1953年。(3)W. F. T. Hartill和K. R. Everett,《新西兰作物与园艺科学杂志》30:249,2002年。