• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿柏西普与雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿合并视网膜脱离的比较。

Comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema associated with subretinal detachment.

作者信息

Ozkaya Abdullah, Demir Gokhan, Kirmaci Asli

机构信息

Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;30(2):363-369. doi: 10.1177/1120672119827855. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1177/1120672119827855
PMID:30757913
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, comparative study. The treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients who had diabetic macular edema associated with subfoveal retinal detachment and underwent intravitreal aflibercept or intravitreal ranibizumab treatment were included. The patients were treated on a pro re nata treatment regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and the follow-up time was 12 months. The primary outcome measure of this study was the presence of subfoveal retinal detachment after treatment at different time points. The secondary outcome measures were the change in best corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness.

RESULTS

A total of 46 eyes of 46 patients were included. The aflibercept group consisted of 20 and the ranibizumab group consisted of 26 eyes. During the follow-up period of 12 months, subfoveal retinal detachment was completely resolved in 75% versus 57.7% of the eyes at month 3 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 76.9% at month 6 (p = 0.2), 90% versus 65.4% at month 9 (p = 0.05), and 100% versus 80.8% at month 12 (p = 0.03) in the intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab groups. The change in best corrected visual acuity was not statistically different between the groups at months 3, 6, 9, and 12, respectively (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Both intravitreal aflibercept and intravitreal ranibizumab were effective in regards to anatomical and functional outcomes of diabetic macular edema patients associated with subfoveal retinal detachment. Interestingly, intravitreal aflibercept seemed more effective than intravitreal ranibizumab in the resolution of subfoveal retinal detachment at month 12.

摘要

目的

比较雷珠单抗和阿柏西普治疗伴有黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性比较研究。纳入初治的伴有黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离且接受玻璃体内注射阿柏西普或玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者。患者在给予3个月一次的负荷剂量注射后按需治疗,随访时间为12个月。本研究的主要结局指标是不同时间点治疗后黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离的情况。次要结局指标是最佳矫正视力和中心视网膜厚度的变化。

结果

共纳入46例患者的46只眼。阿柏西普组20只眼,雷珠单抗组26只眼。在12个月的随访期内,玻璃体内注射阿柏西普组与玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗组相比,黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离在第3个月时完全消退的眼数分别为75%和57.7%(p = 0.2),第6个月时为90%和76.9%(p = 0.2),第9个月时为90%和65.4%(p = 0.05),第12个月时为100%和80.8%(p = 0.03)。在第3、6、9和12个月时,两组间最佳矫正视力的变化无统计学差异(所有p均>0.05)。

结论

玻璃体内注射阿柏西普和玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗对于伴有黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的解剖和功能结局均有效。有趣的是,在第12个月时,玻璃体内注射阿柏西普在消退黄斑中心凹下视网膜脱离方面似乎比玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗更有效。

相似文献

1
Comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema associated with subretinal detachment.阿柏西普与雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿合并视网膜脱离的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;30(2):363-369. doi: 10.1177/1120672119827855. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
2
A Comparison Study of Ranibizumab and Aflibercept in Patients with Naive Diabetic Macular Edema in Presence of Serous Retinal Detachment.在存在浆液性视网膜脱离的情况下,雷珠单抗和阿柏西普在初发糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者中的对比研究。
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Sep;44(9):987-993. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1608260. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
COMPARISON OF INTRAVITREAL DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT AND AFLIBERCEPT IN PATIENTS WITH TREATMENT-NAIVE DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA WITH SEROUS RETINAL DETACHMENT.初治的糖尿病性黄斑水肿伴浆液性视网膜脱离患者玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物与阿柏西普的比较
Retina. 2020 Jun;40(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002537.
4
Ranibizumab versus aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 18-month results of a comparative, prospective, randomized study and multivariate analysis of visual outcome predictors.雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项比较、前瞻性、随机研究的 18 个月结果及视觉预后预测因素的多元分析。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2020 Dec;39(4):317-322. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2020.1802741. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
5
Evaluation of ranibizumab and aflibercept for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in daily clinical practice.评价雷珠单抗和阿柏西普在日常临床实践中治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的效果。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0223793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223793. eCollection 2019.
6
Intravitreal Ranibizumab Versus Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema in Vitrectomized Eyes: 12 Month Results.玻璃体腔内注射雷珠单抗与阿柏西普治疗玻璃体切除术后眼的糖尿病性黄斑水肿:12个月结果
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 17;36(8):723-727. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1900287. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
7
Ranibizumab or Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema: Comparison of 1-Year Outcomes from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:抗视网膜病变!注册研究的 1 年结局比较。
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):608-615. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
8
Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.前瞻性研究阿柏西普治疗对长期贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗无反应的视网膜静脉阻塞继发持续性黄斑水肿的疗效。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;48(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13636. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema in a Taiwanese Health Service Setting.在台湾医疗服务环境中玻璃体内注射阿柏西普与雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的比较
Semin Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 3;36(3):132-138. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1889620. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Association of Baseline Visual Acuity and Retinal Thickness With 1-Year Efficacy of Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, and Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema.基线视力和视网膜厚度与阿柏西普、贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿1年疗效的相关性
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;134(2):127-34. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4599.

引用本文的文献

1
Aflibercept or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.阿柏西普或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;13(1):16-26. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1490. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Aflibercept Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 26;34(2):133-147. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_308_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
3
Clinical Comparative Study of Intravitreal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Cystoid Macular Edema.
玻璃体内注射曲安奈德与阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性视网膜病变黄斑囊样水肿的临床对比研究
Emerg Med Int. 2022 May 18;2022:1348855. doi: 10.1155/2022/1348855. eCollection 2022.
4
Immune-based Therapies-What the Emergency Physician Needs to Know.免疫治疗——急诊医师须知。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;40(1):135-148. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2021.08.011. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
VEGFR1 signaling in retinal angiogenesis and microinflammation.VEGFR1 信号在视网膜血管生成和微炎症中的作用。
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021 Sep;84:100954. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100954. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Managing Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Strategies and Treatment Options.临床实践中糖尿病性黄斑水肿的管理:当前策略与治疗选择的系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 29;15:375-385. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S236423. eCollection 2021.