Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Sep;50(5):2877-2892. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14370. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
Mirror neurons (MN) have been proposed as the neural substrate for a wide range of clinical, social and cognitive phenomena. Over the last decade, a commonly used tool for investigating MN activity in the human brain has been functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) repetition suppression (RS) paradigms. However, the available evidence is mixed, largely owing to inconsistent application of the methodological criteria necessary to infer MN properties. This raises concerns about the degree to which one can infer the presence (or absence) of MN activity from earlier accounts that adopted RS paradigms. We aimed to clarify this issue using a well-validated fMRI RS paradigm and tested for mirror properties by rigorously applying the widely accepted criteria necessary to demonstrate MN activity using traditional univariate techniques and Multivariate Pattern Analysis (MVPA). While univariate whole brain analysis in healthy adults showed uni-modal RS effects within the supplementary motor area, no evidence for cross-modal RS effects consistent with mirror neuron activity was found. MVPA on the other hand revealed a region along the anterior intraparietal sulcus that met the criteria for MN activity. Taken together, these results clarify disparate evidence from earlier RS studies, highlighting that traditional univariate analysis of RS data may not be sensitive for detecting MN activity when rigorously applying the requisite criteria. In light of these findings, we recommend that short of increasing sample sizes substantially, future studies using RS paradigms to investigate MNs across the human brain consider the use of MVPA.
镜像神经元(MN)被认为是广泛的临床、社会和认知现象的神经基础。在过去的十年中,用于研究人类大脑中 MN 活动的常用工具是功能磁共振(fMRI)重复抑制(RS)范式。然而,现有的证据是混杂的,主要是由于对推断 MN 特性所需的方法学标准的应用不一致。这引起了人们的关注,即从早期采用 RS 范式的报告中,人们在多大程度上可以推断 MN 活动的存在(或不存在)。我们旨在使用经过充分验证的 fMRI RS 范式来澄清这个问题,并通过严格应用传统单变量技术和多变量模式分析(MVPA)来证明 MN 活性所需的广泛接受的标准来测试镜像特性。虽然健康成年人的全脑单变量分析显示在辅助运动区存在单峰 RS 效应,但没有发现与镜像神经元活动一致的跨模态 RS 效应的证据。另一方面,MVPA 揭示了沿额内上沟的一个区域,符合 MN 活动的标准。总之,这些结果澄清了早期 RS 研究中的不同证据,强调了当严格应用必要的标准时,对 RS 数据进行传统的单变量分析可能无法灵敏地检测 MN 活性。鉴于这些发现,我们建议,除非大幅增加样本量,否则未来使用 RS 范式研究人类大脑中的 MN 的研究应考虑使用 MVPA。