Abel-Smith B
London School of Economics and Political Science.
Milbank Q. 1988;66(4):694-719.
Consumer-controlled health insurance groups in northern Europe in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries resembled modern American HMOs in many ways. Fierceness of competition hindered European doctors' control of their own services, prompting them to organize physician-dominated insurance groups and to extend their power through means of licensure, boycott, and supportive government regulation. While patients thus gained the right to choose their own doctor, physicians were able to negotiate more favorable payment standards, including price discrimination by patients' income levels. The experience may foreshadow more ruthless operation of market principles among American HMOs, and raise questions about the HMO model's viability for Europe today.
19世纪末20世纪初北欧由消费者控制的健康保险集团在许多方面类似于现代美国的健康维护组织(HMO)。激烈的竞争阻碍了欧洲医生对自身服务的控制,促使他们组建以医生为主导的保险集团,并通过执照发放、抵制和政府支持性监管等手段来扩大自身权力。虽然患者因此获得了选择自己医生的权利,但医生能够协商更优惠的支付标准,包括根据患者收入水平进行价格歧视。这一经历可能预示着美国健康维护组织中市场原则的运作将更加无情,并引发对当今欧洲健康维护组织模式可行性的质疑。