Zimmerman Heather Lynne, Mülhausen Michelle, Tuck Emma
a Department of International Development , London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) , London , UK.
Med Confl Surviv. 2019 Mar;35(1):12-42. doi: 10.1080/13623699.2019.1573801. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
Attacks on healthcare in conflict (AHCC) is receiving increased attention as a pressing global concern from humanitarian organisations, the media, policymakers, academics, and the public. This study examines the extent to which this increased attention leads to mainstream reporting and understanding of AHCC that is representative of reality by investigating the ways that information and knowledge about the issue is produced. Based on a rapid review of documentation on AHCC since 2011, this is one of the first studies to assess the rigour, validity, and representativeness of mainstream data on AHCC. Findings indicate that information and knowledge about AHCC is molded by a particular representation of the issue created by international media and humanitarian organisations seeking to capture public and political attention. This dominant understanding is not representative of the complex reality of AHCC, but is instead driven by organisational objectives and advocacy agendas. These findings hold important implications for the above-mentioned stakeholders by exploring the complexity and impacts of documenting AHCC. Most notably, the research investigates the relationship between information and understanding about the issue and the action that it encourages.
冲突中的医疗袭击(AHCC)作为一个紧迫的全球问题,正受到人道主义组织、媒体、政策制定者、学者和公众越来越多的关注。本研究通过调查有关该问题的信息和知识的产生方式,考察了这种关注度的提高在多大程度上导致了对AHCC的主流报道和符合现实情况的理解。基于对2011年以来AHCC相关文献的快速回顾,这是首批评估AHCC主流数据的严谨性、有效性和代表性的研究之一。研究结果表明,有关AHCC的信息和知识是由国际媒体和人道主义组织为吸引公众和政治关注而创造的对该问题的特定呈现所塑造的。这种主导性的理解并不代表AHCC的复杂现实,而是由组织目标和宣传议程驱动的。通过探讨记录AHCC的复杂性和影响,这些发现对上述利益相关者具有重要意义。最值得注意的是,该研究调查了有关该问题的信息与理解以及它所鼓励的行动之间的关系。