Domi Ana, Stopponi Serena, Domi Esi, Ciccocioppo Roberto, Cannella Nazzareno
Pharmacology Unit, School of Pharmacy, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jan 30;13:3. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00003. eCollection 2019.
Recent animal models of alcohol use disorder (AUD) are centered in capturing individual vulnerability differences in disease progression. Here, we used genetically selected Marchigian Sardinian alcohol-preferring (msP) and Wistars rats to apply a multidimensional model of AUD adapted from a previously described DSM-IV/DSM-5 multisymptomatic cocaine addiction model. As proof of concept, we hypothesized that msP rats, genetically selected for excessive drinking, would be more prone to develop dependence-like behavior compared to Wistars. Before exposure of animals to alcohol, we monitored basal anxiety in the elevated plus maze (EPM). Animals were then trained in prolonged operant alcohol self-administration, consisting of 30-min daily sessions for 60 days in total. Each session consisted of two 10-min periods of alcohol reinforcement separated by 10-min interval of non-reinforcement. Following training, we applied three criteria of individual vulnerability for AUD: (1) persistence of lever pressing for alcohol when it was not available; (2) motivation for alcohol in a progressive ratio (PR) schedule of reinforcement; and (3) resistance to punishment when alcohol delivery was anticipated by a foot-shock (0.3 mA). We obtained four groups corresponding to the number of criteria met (0-3 crit). Rats in the 0crit and 1crit groups were characterized as resilient, whereas rats in the 2crit and 3crit groups were characterized as prone to develop a dependent-like phenotype. As predicted, the 2-3crit groups were enriched with msP rats while the 0-1crit groups were enriched in Wistar rats. In further analysis, we calculated the global addiction score (GAS) per subject by the sum of the normalized score (z-score) of each criterion. Results showed GAS was highly correlated with animal distribution within the 3 criteria. Specifically, GAS was negative in the 0-1crit groups, and positive in the 2-3crit groups. A positive correlation between basal anxiety and quantity of alcohol intake was detected in msP rats but not Wistars. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the 0/3criteria model is a suitable approach to study individual differences in AUD and that msP rats, selected for excessive-alcohol drinking, show a higher propensity to develop AUD compared to non-preferring Wistars.
近期酒精使用障碍(AUD)的动物模型主要围绕捕捉疾病进展中个体易感性差异展开。在此,我们使用经基因筛选的马尔基安撒丁岛嗜酒(msP)大鼠和Wistar大鼠,应用一种改编自先前描述的DSM-IV/DSM-5多症状可卡因成瘾模型的AUD多维模型。作为概念验证,我们假设,经基因筛选具有过度饮酒倾向的msP大鼠比Wistar大鼠更易出现类似依赖的行为。在动物接触酒精之前,我们在高架十字迷宫(EPM)中监测其基础焦虑水平。然后对动物进行长时间的操作性酒精自我给药训练,总共进行60天,每天训练30分钟。每次训练包括两个10分钟的酒精强化期,中间间隔10分钟的无强化期。训练后,我们应用了AUD个体易感性的三个标准:(1)在无法获得酒精时按压杠杆获取酒精的持续性;(2)在渐进比率(PR)强化程序中对酒精的动机;(3)当预期通过足部电击(0.3 mA)给予酒精时对惩罚的抵抗力。我们获得了与满足标准数量(0 - 3个标准)相对应的四组大鼠。0标准组和1标准组的大鼠表现为有恢复力,而2标准组和3标准组的大鼠表现为易出现类似依赖的表型。如预期的那样,2 - 3标准组中msP大鼠富集,而0 - 1标准组中Wistar大鼠富集。在进一步分析中,我们通过每个标准的标准化分数(z分数)之和计算每个受试者的总体成瘾分数(GAS)。结果显示,GAS与动物在三个标准中的分布高度相关。具体而言,GAS在0 - 1标准组中为负,在2 - 3标准组中为正。在msP大鼠中检测到基础焦虑与酒精摄入量之间呈正相关,而在Wistar大鼠中未检测到。总之,我们证明了0/3标准模型是研究AUD个体差异的合适方法,并且经基因筛选具有过度饮酒倾向的msP大鼠与非嗜酒的Wistar大鼠相比,表现出更高的AUD发病倾向。