Suppr超能文献

含氧化锆玻璃离子水门汀与Miracle Mix及银汞合金微渗漏的比较分析:一项体外研究

Comparative Analysis of Microleakage of Zirconia-infused Glass Ionomer Cement with Miracle Mix and Amalgam: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Ranadheer Eeraveni, Shah Utsav D, Neelakantappa Kiran Kumar, Fernandes Shoba

机构信息

Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Mithila Minority Dental College & Hospital, Bihar, IND.

Paediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Utsav Paediatric & Multispeciality Dental Clinic, Surat, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Dec 3;10(12):e3672. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3672.

Abstract

Context Various restorative materials are introduced in dentistry to achieve adequate strength and restore aesthetics. Dental amalgam is a versatile material with self-sealing property, but is unaesthetic. Other restorative materials like composites require conservative preparation, but exhibit polymerisation shrinkage resulting in microleakage. To overcome these drawbacks, a high strength restorative material reinforced with ceramic and zirconia fillers known as Zirconomer (Shofu Inc., Japan) has been introduced. Aims This in vitro study aims to evaluate and compare the microleakage of zirconia-infused glass ionomer cement (Zirconomer) with Miracle Mix (GC Fuji Miracle Mix, Japan) and amalgam. Materials and methods In this in vitro study, 30 non-carious premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n=10) depending on the restorative material used-Silver Amalgam (DPI, India), Miracle Mix, and Zirconomer. Standard Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of 30 non-carious extracted premolars. The restored teeth were thermocycled and then immersed in 2% methylene blue dye for 24 hours. All teeth were bisected longitudinally in a buccolingual direction and observed under a stereo microscope at 40X magnification for the evidence of dye penetration. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Walis tests (p<0.01). Results Zirconomer showed the least microleakage in Class V cavity restoration with a statistically significant difference to amalgam and Miracle Mix. Conclusions Zirconomer has proven to be an excellent restorative material as it showed the least microleakage followed by Miracle Mix and amalgam. Zirconomer raises the bar for restorative reinforced glass ionomers by outperforming conventional glass ionomers and amalgam restoration.

摘要

背景

牙科领域引入了各种修复材料,以实现足够的强度并恢复美观。银汞合金是一种具有自密封特性的多功能材料,但不美观。其他修复材料如复合材料需要保守的预备,但会出现聚合收缩导致微渗漏。为克服这些缺点,一种用陶瓷和氧化锆填料增强的高强度修复材料——Zirconomer(日本松风株式会社)已被引入。

目的

本体外研究旨在评估并比较含氧化锆的玻璃离子水门汀(Zirconomer)与Miracle Mix(日本GC Fuji Miracle Mix)及银汞合金的微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

在本体外研究中,30颗非龋前磨牙根据所使用的修复材料随机分为三组(n = 10)——银汞合金(印度DPI)、Miracle Mix和Zirconomer。在30颗非龋拔除前磨牙的颊面制备标准V类洞。修复后的牙齿进行热循环,然后浸入2%亚甲蓝染料中24小时。所有牙齿沿颊舌方向纵向剖开,在体视显微镜下以40倍放大倍数观察染料渗透情况。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Kruskal-Walis检验(p < 0.01)分析数据。

结果

Zirconomer在V类洞修复中显示出最少的微渗漏,与银汞合金和Miracle Mix相比有统计学显著差异。

结论

Zirconomer已被证明是一种出色的修复材料,因为它显示出最少的微渗漏,其次是Miracle Mix和银汞合金。Zirconomer通过优于传统玻璃离子水门汀和银汞合金修复,提高了增强型玻璃离子修复材料的标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f871/6367111/169c63eb9def/cureus-0010-00000003672-i01.jpg

相似文献

2
An in vitro Evaluation of Microleakage of Posterior Teeth Restored with Amalgam, Composite and Zirconomer - A Stereomicroscopic Study.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC65-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13024.6225. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
3
A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials.
Biomater Investig Dent. 2022 Feb 10;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/26415275.2022.2033623. eCollection 2022.
4
Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer®: A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
5
Effect of protective coating agents on microleakage and flexural strength of glass ionomer cement and zirconomer. an in vitro study.
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00853-8. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
6
A Comparative Evaluation of Sorption, Solubility, and Compressive Strength of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements in Artificial Saliva: An Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;10(1):49-54. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1407. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass lonomer Cement.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 May 1;17(5):394-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1861.
9
An Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer®: A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
2
Microleakage in different primary tooth restorations.
J Chin Med Assoc. 2016 Apr;79(4):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.10.007. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
An in vitro Evaluation of Microleakage of Posterior Teeth Restored with Amalgam, Composite and Zirconomer - A Stereomicroscopic Study.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Jul;9(7):ZC65-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13024.6225. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
4
A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012 May;5(2):101-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1145. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
6
Nanoionomer: evaluation of microleakage.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jan-Mar;29(1):20-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79919.
8
Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials.
Braz Dent J. 2004;15(1):13-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402004000100003. Epub 2004 Aug 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验