Wadenya Rose, Smith Jennifer, Mante Francis
Department of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
N Y State Dent J. 2010 Jun-Jul;76(4):36-9.
This study compared the marginal leakage of nano-particle-filled resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) restorations made using atraumatic restorative technique (ART) and conventional technique. Twenty primary molars with carious dentin on the buccal surfaces were restored with RMGIC using ART. The teeth were thermally cycled, sectioned and stained with methylene blue. Micro-leakage was compared to a second set of teeth restored conventionally. No significant difference (p > 0.05) in leakage was noted between the conventional and ART groups. The authors concluded that ART with RMGIC provides margins that show comparable leakage to conventionally restored primary teeth.
本研究比较了采用非创伤性修复技术(ART)和传统技术制作的纳米颗粒填充树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)修复体的边缘渗漏情况。对20颗颊面有龋坏牙本质的乳磨牙采用ART技术用RMGIC进行修复。对这些牙齿进行热循环、切片并用亚甲蓝染色。将微渗漏情况与另一组采用传统方法修复的牙齿进行比较。传统组和ART组之间在渗漏方面未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。作者得出结论,使用RMGIC的ART技术所提供的边缘与传统修复的乳牙相比,渗漏情况相当。