Suppr超能文献

老年神经认知障碍患者基本日常生活活动、工具性日常生活活动和高级日常生活活动与执行功能的关系。

The relationship between basic, instrumental, and advanced activities of daily living and executive functioning in geriatric patients with neurocognitive disorders.

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Frailty in Ageing Research Group (FRIA), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;34(6):889-899. doi: 10.1002/gps.5087. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although many studies explored the relationship between executive functions (EF) and activities of daily living (ADLs) in cognitive disorders, previous studies used measurements without well-defined levels of ADLs. This study explored the relationship between EF and the threefold classification of everyday functioning (basic or b-, instrumental or i-, and advanced or a-ADLs) and examined how EF account for the variance in this triad of everyday functioning.

METHODS

A sample of 44 cognitively healthy persons, 41 persons with mild cognitive impairment, and 35 persons with Alzheimer disease were assessed with comprehensive measures of EF and the b-, i-, and a-ADL tools.

RESULTS

Correlations demonstrated that subjects with higher executive dysfunctions have more limitations in b-, i-, and a-ADLs. The highest significant correlations with measures of EF were seen in i- and a-ADLs (ranging from r = -0.193 to r = -0.559, P < 0.05). However, correlations with a-ADLs were not stronger than with i-ADLs. The multivariate analyses revealed Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) as a significant contributor of everyday functioning in b-ADLs, as well as i- and a-ADLs, and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) and Animal Fluency Test (AFT) seemed to contribute significantly to variance in i- and a-ADLs.

CONCLUSIONS

EF are less related to b-ADLs than i- and a-ADLs and contribute to the same amount of variance to limitations in both i- and a-ADLs. This study recommends using the TMT-A, CDT, and AFT as screening tools to indicate the need for profound evaluation of ADLs in older persons with neurocognitive disorders.

摘要

目的

尽管许多研究探讨了执行功能(EF)与认知障碍患者日常生活活动(ADL)之间的关系,但之前的研究使用的测量方法没有明确界定 ADL 水平。本研究探讨了 EF 与日常生活功能三分法(基本或 b-、工具或 i-和高级或 a-ADL)之间的关系,并检验了 EF 如何解释这三种日常生活功能的变异性。

方法

一个包含 44 名认知健康个体、41 名轻度认知障碍患者和 35 名阿尔茨海默病患者的样本接受了 EF 综合测量和 b-、i-和 a-ADL 工具的评估。

结果

相关性分析表明,执行功能障碍较高的患者在 b-、i-和 a-ADL 方面的限制更多。EF 测量与 i-和 a-ADL 的相关性最高(范围从 r=-0.193 到 r=-0.559,P<0.05)。然而,与 a-ADL 的相关性并不强于与 i-ADL 的相关性。多元分析显示,连线测试 A(TMT-A)是 b-ADL 以及 i-和 a-ADL 日常功能的重要贡献者,而画钟测验(CDT)和动物流畅性测验(AFT)似乎对 i-和 a-ADL 的变异性有显著贡献。

结论

EF 与 b-ADL 的相关性低于 i-和 a-ADL,对 i-和 a-ADL 的限制程度的变异性贡献相同。本研究建议使用 TMT-A、CDT 和 AFT 作为筛查工具,以指示需要对患有神经认知障碍的老年人进行更深入的 ADL 评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验