Csipke Emese, Wykes Til, Nash Stephen, Williams Paul, Koeser Leo, McCrone Paul, Rose Diana, Craig Tom
Doctor, Senior Research Fellow,Division of Psychiatry,University College London,UK.
Professor Dame,Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology and Neuroscience,King's College London,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,UK.
BJPsych Open. 2019 Jan;5(1):e17. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2018.87.
Although patients value evidence-based therapeutic activities, little is known about nurses' perceptions.AimsTo investigate whether implementing an activities training programme would positively alter staff perceptions of the ward or be detrimental through the increased workload (trial registration: ISRCTN 06545047).
We conducted a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial involving 16 wards with psychology-led nurse training as the intervention. The main outcome was a staff self-report measure of perceptions of the ward (VOTE) and secondary outcomes measuring potential deterioration were the Index of Work Satisfaction (IWS) and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Data were analysed using mixed-effects regression models, with repeated assessments from staff over time.
There were 1075 valid outcome measurements from 539 nursing staff. VOTE scores did not change over time (standardised effect size 0.04, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.18, P = 0.54), neither did IWS or MBI scores (IWS, standardised effect size 0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.16, P = 0.74; MBI standardised effect size -0.09, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.06, P = 0.24). There was a mean increase of 1.5 activities per ward (95% CI -0.4 to 3.4, P = 0.12) and on average 6.3 more patients attended groups (95% CI -4.1 to 16.6, P = 0.23) following training. Staff feedback on training was positive.
Our training programme did not change nurses' perceptions of the ward, job satisfaction or burnout. During the study period many service changes occurred, most having a negative impact through increased pressure on staffing, patient mix and management so it is perhaps unsurprising that we found no benefits or reduction in staff skill.Declaration of interestNone.
尽管患者重视基于证据的治疗活动,但对于护士的看法却知之甚少。
调查实施一项活动培训计划是否会积极改变工作人员对病房的看法,或者是否会因工作量增加而产生不利影响(试验注册号:ISRCTN 06545047)。
我们进行了一项阶梯式楔形整群随机试验,涉及16个病房,以心理引导的护士培训作为干预措施。主要结局是工作人员对病房看法的自我报告测量指标(VOTE),衡量潜在恶化情况的次要结局指标是工作满意度指数(IWS)和马氏职业倦怠量表(MBI)。使用混合效应回归模型对数据进行分析,工作人员会随着时间进行重复评估。
539名护理人员共有1075项有效的结局测量数据。VOTE分数随时间未发生变化(标准化效应量为0.04,95%置信区间为-0.09至0.18,P = 0.54),IWS或MBI分数也未变化(IWS,标准化效应量为0.02,95%置信区间为-0.11至0.16,P = 0.74;MBI标准化效应量为-0.09,95%置信区间为-0.24至0.06,P = 0.24)。培训后,每个病房的活动平均增加了1.5项(95%置信区间为-0.4至3.4,P = 0.12),平均有6.3名更多患者参加了小组活动(95%置信区间为-4.1至16.6,P = 0.23)。工作人员对培训的反馈是积极的。
我们的培训计划并未改变护士对病房的看法、工作满意度或职业倦怠情况。在研究期间发生了许多服务变更,大多数通过增加人员配备压力、患者构成和管理等方面产生了负面影响,所以我们未发现有任何益处或工作人员技能的降低,这也许并不奇怪。
无。