IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Oct;66(10):2924-2935. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2898871. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
This paper reviews the state-of-the-art neuromarkers development for the prognosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The first part of this paper is devoted to reviewing the recently emerged machine learning (ML) algorithms based on electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) modalities. In particular, the methods are categorized by different types of neuromarkers. The second part of the review is dedicated to a series of investigations that further highlight the differences between these two modalities. First, several source reconstruction methods are reviewed and their source-level performances explored, followed by an objective comparison between EEG and MEG from multiple perspectives. Finally, a number of the most recent reports on classification of MCI/AD during resting state using EEG/MEG are documented to show the up-to-date performance for this well-recognized data collecting scenario. It is noticed that the MEG modality may be particularly effective in distinguishing between subjects with MCI and healthy controls, a high classification accuracy of more than 98% was reported recently; whereas the EEG seems to be performing well in classifying AD and healthy subjects, which also reached around 98% of the accuracy. A number of influential factors have also been raised and suggested for careful considerations while evaluating the ML-based diagnosis systems in the real-world scenarios.
本文回顾了用于预测阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的神经标记物的最新进展。本文的第一部分致力于回顾基于脑电图(EEG)和脑磁图(MEG)模式的新兴机器学习(ML)算法。特别是,这些方法按不同类型的神经标记物进行分类。本文的第二部分专门研究了一系列研究,这些研究进一步突出了这两种模式之间的差异。首先,回顾了几种源重建方法,并探讨了它们在源水平上的性能,然后从多个角度对 EEG 和 MEG 进行了客观比较。最后,记录了一些使用 EEG/MEG 在静息状态下对 MCI/AD 进行分类的最新报告,以展示在这种公认的数据采集场景下的最新性能。值得注意的是,MEG 模式在区分 MCI 患者和健康对照者方面可能特别有效,最近有报道称其分类准确率超过 98%;而 EEG 似乎在区分 AD 患者和健康受试者方面表现良好,准确率也达到了 98%左右。在评估现实场景中基于 ML 的诊断系统时,还提出了一些有影响力的因素,并建议加以考虑。