Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Public Health, China Medical University College of Public Health, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):578.e1-578.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Many studies have documented a lower likelihood of live birth with increasing body mass index among women undergoing assisted reproductive technology, but few have examined the association with waist circumference, an anthropometric measure that allows assessment of central adiposity.
To examine the relation between baseline waist circumference and infertility treatment outcomes among women undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology.
We followed up 264 women who underwent 445 assisted reproductive technology cycles for infertility treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital between 2010 and 2017. Waist circumference was assessed at enrollment. We used cluster-weighted generalized estimating equation models to estimate the probability of live birth by tertiles of waist circumference (<77, 77-86, >86 cm), while accounting for multiple treatment cycles per woman and adjusting for age, race, smoking, infertility diagnosis, day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone, body mass index, and height.
Mean (standard deviation) waist circumference and body mass index were 83.6 (12.6) cm and 24.1 (4.3) kg/m, respectively. Waist circumference and body mass index were positively correlated (r = 0.69, P < .0001). Waist circumference was inversely related to the probability of live birth after adjusting for BMI and other confounders. The multivariable adjusted probability of live birth (95% confidence interval) for women in increasing tertiles of waist circumference were 53% (42-65%), 42% (32-53%), and 38% (28-50%) (P, trend = .04). When women were classified in joint categories of body mass index and waist circumference, women with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m and a waist circumference ≥77 cm had the lowest live birth rate (38% [27-50%]), whereas women with a body mass index between 18.5 and 25 kg/m and a waist circumference <77 cm had the highest (54% [42-66%]). The results were similar using different waist circumference cut-off values.
Waist circumference was inversely related to the probability of live birth among women undergoing assisted reproductive technology independently of body mass index.
许多研究表明,接受辅助生殖技术的女性,体质量指数(BMI)越高,活产的可能性越低,但很少有研究探讨腰围与不孕治疗结果的关系,腰围是一种衡量中心性肥胖的人体测量指标。
研究接受辅助生殖技术治疗的女性基线腰围与不孕治疗结局的关系。
我们对 2010 年至 2017 年在马萨诸塞州综合医院接受辅助生殖技术治疗的 264 名女性的 445 个辅助生殖技术周期进行了随访。在入组时评估了腰围。我们使用聚类加权广义估计方程模型,在考虑到每个女性多个治疗周期的情况下,通过腰围三分位(<77cm、77-86cm、>86cm)来估计活产的概率,并调整了年龄、种族、吸烟状况、不孕诊断、第 3 天卵泡刺激素、BMI 和身高。
平均(标准差)腰围和 BMI 分别为 83.6(12.6)cm 和 24.1(4.3)kg/m2。腰围和 BMI 呈正相关(r=0.69,P<0.0001)。在调整 BMI 和其他混杂因素后,腰围与活产概率呈负相关。按腰围三分位递增,多变量校正后的活产概率(95%置信区间)分别为 53%(42%-65%)、42%(32%-53%)和 38%(28%-50%)(P,趋势=0.04)。当女性按照 BMI 和腰围的联合类别分类时,BMI≥25kg/m2 且腰围≥77cm 的女性活产率最低(38%[27%-50%]),而 BMI 在 18.5kg/m2 和 25kg/m2 之间且腰围<77cm 的女性活产率最高(54%[42%-66%])。使用不同的腰围截断值,结果相似。
在接受辅助生殖技术的女性中,腰围与活产概率呈负相关,独立于 BMI。