• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Make It Fresh, for Less! A Supermarket Meal Bundling and Electronic Reminder Intervention to Promote Healthy Purchases Among Families With Children.让食物保持新鲜,花费更少!超市捆绑套餐和电子提醒干预措施,以促进有孩子的家庭购买健康食品。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;51(4):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.超级市场双倍优惠激励计划增加有孩子的低收入家庭购买新鲜水果和蔬菜:健康双研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
3
Choice architecture to promote fruit and vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC): randomized corner store pilot study.通过参与妇女、婴儿和儿童特别补充营养计划(WIC)的家庭促进水果和蔬菜购买的选择架构:随机街角商店试点研究
Public Health Nutr. 2017 May;20(7):1297-1305. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003074. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Patterns and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation: Findings From a Nationally Representative Survey.水果和蔬菜购买模式与补充营养援助计划参与情况:一项全国代表性调查的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Oct;120(10):1633-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
5
Association of a Fruit and Vegetable Subsidy Program With Food Purchases by Individuals With Low Income in the US.美国低收入个体的蔬果补贴计划与食品购买之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20377.
6
Supermarket Purchases Over the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Month: A Comparison Between Participants and Nonparticipants.超市购买量超过补充营养援助计划受益月:参与者与非参与者之间的比较。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):800-807. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.025.
7
Measuring Micro-Level Effects of a New Supermarket: Do Residents Within 0.5 Mile Have Improved Dietary Behaviors?衡量新超市的微观影响:0.5 英里内的居民是否改善了饮食行为?
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;118(6):1037-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.06.360. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
8
Association between store food environment and customer purchases in small grocery stores, gas-marts, pharmacies and dollar stores.小型杂货店、加油站便利店、药店和一元店的店内食品环境与顾客购买行为之间的关联。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 5;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0531-x.
9
Association of Funding and Meal Preparation Time With Nutritional Quality of Meals of Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program Recipients.资金来源和备餐时间与补充营养援助计划受助人膳食营养质量的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2114701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14701.
10
Financial Incentives Increase Purchases Of Fruit And Vegetables Among Lower-Income Households With Children.经济激励措施增加了有孩子的低收入家庭购买水果和蔬菜的数量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1557-1566. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05420.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer Health Informatics to Advance Precision Prevention.促进精准预防的消费者健康信息学
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):149-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800735. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
2
Tensorial Principal Component Analysis in Detecting Temporal Trajectories of Purchase Patterns in Loyalty Card Data: Retrospective Cohort Study.张量主成分分析在 loyalty card 数据中检测购买模式时间轨迹:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e44599. doi: 10.2196/44599.
3
A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing nutritious meal kits and no-prep meals to improve food security and diet quality among food pantry clients.一项比较营养餐盒和无需准备的餐食以改善食品储藏室客户的食品安全和饮食质量的试点随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;23(1):2389. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17355-3.
4
Effects of in-store marketing on food and beverage purchases: a longitudinal study of households with children.店内营销对食品和饮料购买的影响:对有孩子的家庭进行的纵向研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec 1;27(1):e4. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023002641.
5
A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Test of a Behavioral Intervention to Improve Adherence to Dietary Recommendations for Cancer Prevention.改善癌症预防饮食建议依从性的行为干预的概念验证初步试验。
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231214122. doi: 10.1177/10732748231214122.
6
Encouraging Healthier Food and Beverage Purchasing and Consumption: A Review of Interventions within Grocery Retail Settings.鼓励更健康的食品和饮料购买和消费:对杂货店零售环境中干预措施的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316107.
7
A systematic review of supermarket automated electronic sales data for population dietary surveillance.超市自动化电子销售数据在人群膳食监测中的系统评价
Nutr Rev. 2022 May 9;80(6):1711-1722. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab089.
8
Effect of Personalized Incentives on Dietary Quality of Groceries Purchased: A Randomized Crossover Trial.个性化激励对购买杂货食品质量的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2030921. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30921.
9
The East Side Table Make-at-Home Meal-Kit Program is feasible and acceptable: A pilot study.《东城区餐桌自制餐包计划的可行性和可接受性:一项试点研究》
Appetite. 2021 May 1;160:105087. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105087. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Improving Consumption and Purchases of Healthier Foods in Retail Environments: A Systematic Review.改善零售环境中更健康食品的消费和购买:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;17(20):7524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207524.

本文引用的文献

1
What factors influence ultra-processed food purchases and consumption in households with children? A comparison between participants and non-participants in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).哪些因素会影响有孩子的家庭购买和消费超加工食品?对参加和未参加补充营养援助计划(SNAP)的人群进行比较。
Appetite. 2019 Mar 1;134:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
2
The Impact of mHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.移动健康干预措施的影响:系统评价的系统综述
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 17;6(1):e23. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8873.
3
Patient reminder and recall interventions to improve immunization rates.提高免疫接种率的患者提醒与召回干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 18;1(1):CD003941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003941.pub3.
4
The effectiveness of smoking cessation, physical activity/diet and alcohol reduction interventions delivered by mobile phones for the prevention of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.手机提供的戒烟、体育活动/饮食及减少饮酒干预措施对预防非传染性疾病的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0189801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189801. eCollection 2018.
5
Nudging at the checkout counter - A longitudinal study of the effect of a food repositioning nudge on healthy food choice.在结账柜台旁轻轻一推——一项关于重新定位食物的促进行动对健康食品选择影响的纵向研究。
Psychol Health. 2018 Jun;33(6):800-809. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2017.1416116. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
6
The conceptualization of a Just-In-Time Adaptive Intervention (JITAI) for the reduction of sedentary behavior in older adults.一种用于减少老年人久坐行为的即时适应性干预(JITAI)的概念化。
Mhealth. 2017 Sep 12;3:37. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.08.05. eCollection 2017.
7
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.超级市场双倍优惠激励计划增加有孩子的低收入家庭购买新鲜水果和蔬菜:健康双研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Healthy Checkout Lines: A Study in Urban Supermarkets.健康结账通道:城市超市研究
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Sep;49(8):615-622.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.02.004.
9
Interventions Designed to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Update.旨在促进高收入国家纯母乳喂养的干预措施:系统评价更新
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Dec;12(10):604-614. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0065. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
A meta-analysis of overall effects of weight loss interventions delivered via mobile phones and effect size differences according to delivery mode, personal contact, and intervention intensity and duration.一项关于通过手机进行减肥干预的总体效果以及根据传递方式、人际接触、干预强度和持续时间的效应量差异的荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2017 Apr;18(4):450-459. doi: 10.1111/obr.12492. Epub 2017 Feb 10.

让食物保持新鲜,花费更少!超市捆绑套餐和电子提醒干预措施,以促进有孩子的家庭购买健康食品。

Make It Fresh, for Less! A Supermarket Meal Bundling and Electronic Reminder Intervention to Promote Healthy Purchases Among Families With Children.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.

Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA; Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;51(4):400-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2019.01.012
PMID:30765298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6461501/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of a supermarket meal bundling and electronic reminder intervention on food choices of families with children.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental (meal bundling) and randomized, controlled trial (electronic reminders).

SETTING

Large supermarket in Maine during 40-week baseline and 16-week intervention periods in 2015-2016.

PARTICIPANTS

English-speaking adults living with at least 1 child aged ≤18 years (n = 300) with 25% of households participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

INTERVENTION(S): (1) Four bundles of ingredients needed to make 8 low-cost healthful meals were promoted in the store through displays and point-of-purchase messaging for 4 weeks each; (2) weekly electronic messages based on principles from behavioral psychology were sent to study participants reminding them to look for meal bundles in the store.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Difference in storewide sales and individual purchases of bundled items (measured using supermarket loyalty card data) from baseline to intervention in intervention vs control groups.

ANALYSIS

Regressions controlling for total food spending and accounting for repeated measures.

RESULTS

There were no differences in spending on bundled items resulting from the meal bundling intervention or the electronic reminders.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Overall, there was little impact of healthful meal bundles and electronic reminders on storewide sales or purchases of promoted items in a large supermarket.

摘要

目的

评估超市套餐捆绑和电子提醒干预对有孩子家庭食物选择的影响。

设计

准实验(套餐捆绑)和随机对照试验(电子提醒)。

地点

2015-2016 年期间缅因州一家大型超市的 40 周基线和 16 周干预期。

参与者

讲英语、至少有 1 名 18 岁以下儿童的成年人(n=300),其中 25%的家庭参加补充营养援助计划。

干预措施

(1)通过展示和购买点信息宣传,在商店中推广 4 种制作 8 种低成本健康餐所需的食材套餐,每种套餐各持续 4 周;(2)每周根据行为心理学原则向研究参与者发送电子信息,提醒他们在商店中寻找套餐。

主要观察指标

(1)干预组与对照组从基线到干预期间,捆绑销售项目的店内总销售额和个人购买额的差异(使用超市会员卡数据衡量)。

分析

控制总食品支出并考虑重复测量的回归分析。

结果

套餐捆绑干预或电子提醒对捆绑销售项目的店内总销售额或购买额没有影响。

结论和意义

总体而言,在一家大型超市中,健康套餐和电子提醒对店内总销售额或推广项目的购买额影响甚微。