Buja Alessandra, Rivera Michele, Baldo Vincenzo, Soattin Marta, Rizzolo Ylenia, Zamengo Giuseppe, Boscolo Sarah, Ghiotto Maria Cristina, Damiani Gianfranco
Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, Laboratory of Health Care Services and Health Promotion Evaluation, Hygiene and Public Health Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Department of Cardiologic, Vascular and Thoracic Sciences, and Public Health, Laboratory of Health Care Services and Health Promotion Evaluation, Hygiene and Public Health Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Feb 14. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001679.
The aim of this study was to investigate how palliative care service structures and processes correlate with their outputs and outcomes, measuring the latter respectively in terms of intensity of care and death at home.
The Veneto Regional Health Authorities collected a set of 37 quality indicators for the year 2016, covering the following five dimensions: service integration, service structure, accessibility, professional processes and organisational processes. Their validity was assessed by a panel of 29 palliative care experts. A score was assigned to each indicator on the basis of its relevance. Non-parametric correlations between the care quality indicators and the measures of the palliative care outputs and outcomes were investigated, along with the presence of a monotonic trend in the performance of the local health units (LHU) grouped by 'low', 'medium' or 'high' scores and differences between these groups of LHUs.
The data showed that palliative care service structure and professional processes were the dimensions correlating significantly with the intensity of care coefficient. An increasingly significant statistical trend was found in both the intensity of care coefficient and the proportion of deaths at home for the three groups of LHUs in terms of the professional processes dimension.
Despite its limitations, this study brought to light some statistically significant findings that are worth investigating in larger samples. To achieve improvements in the quality of palliative care, it is important for healthcare providers to know which variables most affect the output and especially the outcomes of the services offered.
本研究旨在调查姑息治疗服务结构和流程如何与其产出和结果相关联,分别从护理强度和在家中死亡情况来衡量后者。
威尼托地区卫生当局收集了2016年的一组37个质量指标,涵盖以下五个维度:服务整合、服务结构、可及性、专业流程和组织流程。由29名姑息治疗专家组成的小组评估了这些指标的有效性。根据每个指标的相关性为其分配一个分数。研究了护理质量指标与姑息治疗产出和结果的衡量指标之间的非参数相关性,以及按“低”、“中”或“高”分数分组的当地卫生单位(LHU)绩效中的单调趋势以及这些LHU组之间的差异。
数据显示,姑息治疗服务结构和专业流程是与护理强度系数显著相关的维度。就专业流程维度而言,三组LHU的护理强度系数和在家中死亡比例均呈现出越来越显著的统计趋势。
尽管本研究存在局限性,但仍揭示了一些具有统计学意义的发现,值得在更大样本中进行调查。为提高姑息治疗质量,医疗服务提供者了解哪些变量对所提供服务的产出尤其是结果影响最大非常重要。