Department of Medicine, Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Aug;98(8):988-996. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13578. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
The impact of placenta previa on pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes has been extensively studied. However, less is known about the possible association of placental location other than previa with pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate if placental location other than previa is associated with adverse pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes.
This is a population-based cohort study, with data from the regional population-based Stockholm-Gotland Obstetric Cohort, Sweden, from 2008 to 2014. The study population included 74 087 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies resulting in live-born infants, with information about placental location from the second-trimester ultrasound screening. The association between placental location (fundal, lateral, anterior or posterior) and pregnancy outcomes was estimated using logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, and adjustments were made for maternal age, height, country of birth, smoking in early pregnancy, sex of the infant and in vitro fertilization. Main outcome measures were pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes.
Compared with posterior placental location, fundal and lateral placental locations were associated with a number of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the most important being: very preterm birth (<32 weeks of gestation) (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.78, 95% CI 1.18-2.63 and aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.39-2.25, respectively), moderate preterm birth (32-36 weeks of gestation) (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.001-1.51 and aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.32-2.00, respectively), small-for-gestational-age birth (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.34-2.07 and aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.39-2.25, respectively) and manual removal of the placenta in vaginal births (aOR 3.27, 95% CI 2.68-3.99 and aOR 3.27, 95% CI 2.60-4.10, respectively). Additionally, lateral placental location was associated with preeclampsia (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.65) and severe postpartum hemorrhage (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.82).
Compared with posterior placental location, fundal and lateral placental locations are associated with a number of adverse pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes.
胎盘前置对妊娠、分娩和婴儿结局的影响已得到广泛研究。然而,对于胎盘位置(除前置胎盘外)与妊娠结局之间的可能关联知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨除前置胎盘外的胎盘位置是否与不良妊娠、分娩和婴儿结局有关。
这是一项基于人群的队列研究,数据来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩-哥德堡地区基于人群的产科队列,研究时间为 2008 年至 2014 年。研究人群包括 74087 名初产妇,均为单胎活产,在妊娠中期超声筛查时记录胎盘位置。使用逻辑回归分析估计胎盘位置(宫底、侧壁、前壁或后壁)与妊娠结局之间的关系。计算比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(95%CI),并对母亲年龄、身高、出生国、妊娠早期吸烟、婴儿性别和体外受精进行了调整。主要结局指标是妊娠、分娩和婴儿结局。
与后壁胎盘位置相比,宫底和侧壁胎盘位置与多种不良妊娠结局相关,最重要的是:极早产(<32 孕周)(调整后 OR [aOR] 1.78,95%CI 1.18-2.63 和 aOR 2.12,95%CI 1.39-2.25)、中度早产(32-36 孕周)(aOR 1.23,95%CI 1.001-1.51 和 aOR 1.62,95%CI 1.32-2.00)、小于胎龄儿(aOR 1.67,95%CI 1.34-2.07 和 aOR 1.77,95%CI 1.39-2.25)和阴道分娩时手动胎盘剥离(aOR 3.27,95%CI 2.68-3.99 和 aOR 3.27,95%CI 2.60-4.10)。此外,侧壁胎盘位置与子痫前期(aOR 1.30,95%CI 1.03-1.65)和严重产后出血(aOR 1.42,95%CI 1.27-1.82)相关。
与后壁胎盘位置相比,宫底和侧壁胎盘位置与多种妊娠、分娩和婴儿结局不良相关。