Cowperthwaite Suzanne M, Kozachik Sharon L
University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Johns Hopkins University.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):198-207. doi: 10.1188/19.
To determine the effect of an evidence-based Pain Stoppers bundled intervention on pain management satisfaction scores and actual pain intensity scores of hospitalized patients with cancer, as well as nurses' knowledge and attitudes on pain.
PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: Participants and nurses took part in a preintervention group (n = 173 and 11, respectively) and a postintervention group (n = 157 and 9, respectively) at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center.
A pre- and postintervention design was used. Evidence-based strategies included staff education, improved staff communication, adoption of caring behaviors and timely responses, improved patient education, and efforts to maintain patients' analgesic levels.
Patient satisfaction with staff improved from preintervention to postintervention. No statistically significant differences were noted in actual pain intensity scores between the groups; however, fewer patients in the postintervention group received chemotherapy within 30 days, and more were admitted for symptom management versus chemotherapy administration. In addition, no difference was noted between RN group scores, although there was statistically significant improvement on individual questions in the postintervention group.
Implementation of a Pain Stoppers bundled intervention may be effective in improving the pain experience for hospitalized patients with solid tumor cancers.
确定基于证据的“疼痛终结者”综合干预措施对癌症住院患者疼痛管理满意度评分和实际疼痛强度评分的影响,以及护士对疼痛的知识和态度。
参与者和护士分别参与了国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心的干预前组(分别为173名和11名)和干预后组(分别为157名和9名)。
采用干预前和干预后设计。基于证据的策略包括员工教育、改善员工沟通、采用关怀行为和及时回应、改善患者教育以及努力维持患者的镇痛水平。
从干预前到干预后,患者对工作人员的满意度有所提高。两组之间的实际疼痛强度评分没有统计学上的显著差异;然而,干预后组中在30天内接受化疗的患者较少,因症状管理而非化疗入院的患者更多。此外,注册护士组的评分之间没有差异,尽管干预后组中个别问题有统计学上的显著改善。
实施“疼痛终结者”综合干预措施可能有效地改善实体肿瘤癌症住院患者的疼痛体验。