Suppr超能文献

利用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜对微/纳米级波导表面粗糙度进行有效的计量和标准研究。

Effective metrology and standard of the surface roughness of micro/nanoscale waveguides with confocal laser scanning microscopy.

作者信息

Sun DeGui, Shang Hongpeng, Jiang Huilin

出版信息

Opt Lett. 2019 Feb 15;44(4):747-750. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.000747.

Abstract

Surface roughness is one of the important parameters affecting the optical scattering loss of dielectric waveguides. Despite extensive research interests in correlating optical losses with surface roughness, not much research focus has been dedicated to the study of an accurate metrology and measurement standard for the characterization of waveguide roughness. In this Letter, we report an effective metrology for the measurement of waveguide surface roughness, using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). We also provide the definition of surface roughness relevant to CLSM terminology based on the measured peak-to-valley (P-V) values, which can be correlated to the conventional root-mean-square roughness, by employing multi-dimensional statistical models. Finally, we demonstrate the use of CLSM metrology in measuring two-dimensional roughness of 10  μm×6  μm silica waveguides, showing an average top surface roughness of 0.151 μm and an average sidewall roughness of 0.203 μm. For comparison, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements are also carried out for the same waveguide samples, and then the measured sidewall roughness values are in the range of 0.08-0.12 μm. Since SEM measures only the amplitude of roughness profile, while CLSM measures the P-V value, after doubling the SEM value, these two methods can provide comparable results of roughness.

摘要

表面粗糙度是影响介质波导光散射损耗的重要参数之一。尽管人们对将光损耗与表面粗糙度相关联有着广泛的研究兴趣,但对于用于表征波导粗糙度的精确计量和测量标准的研究却很少受到关注。在本信函中,我们报告了一种使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)测量波导表面粗糙度的有效计量方法。我们还基于测量的峰谷(P-V)值,根据CLSM术语给出了与表面粗糙度相关的定义,通过采用多维统计模型,该定义可与传统的均方根粗糙度相关联。最后,我们展示了CLSM计量方法在测量10μm×6μm二氧化硅波导二维粗糙度方面的应用,结果表明其顶表面平均粗糙度为0.151μm,侧壁平均粗糙度为0.203μm。作为对比,我们也对相同的波导样品进行了扫描电子显微镜(SEM)测量,测得的侧壁粗糙度值在0.08 - 0.12μm范围内。由于SEM仅测量粗糙度轮廓的幅度,而CLSM测量P-V值,将SEM值翻倍后,这两种方法可提供相当的粗糙度测量结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验