Suppr超能文献

胃大部切除术后残胃胃上皮内瘤变的内镜治疗临床结局。

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2019 May;51(5):675-680. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.11.030. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIM: We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy and compared the clinical outcomes by tumor location and endoscopic treatment modality.

METHODS

We reviewed the data of patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy between January 1996 and August 2013. The treatments included endoscopic resection or argon plasma coagulation.

RESULTS

Herein, 107 patients (median age, 65.1 years; 92 men) encompassing 117 cases of gastric neoplasms in the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy were endoscopically treated. Forty of these lesions were located at anastomotic sites; they were treated with endoscopic resection in 29 cases (72.5%) and argon plasma coagulation in 11 cases (27.5%). For 77 lesions located on the non-anastomotic site, endoscopic resection was performed in 68 cases (88.4%) and argon plasma coagulation was performed in nine cases (11.7%; p = 0.031). The mean endoscopic resection duration was significantly longer in the anastomotic site group than in the non-anastomotic site group (43.6 vs. 26.3 min, p = 0.018). Recurrence was observed in five (12.8%) patients in the former and in one (1.3%) in the latter (p = 0.015); all the patients were successfully retreated with endoscopic resection or APC.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment for gastric epithelial neoplasm in a remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy is effective and safe. However, closely monitoring for recurrence should be conducted, particularly when the tumor is located at the anastomotic site.

摘要

背景/目的:我们旨在评估内镜治疗胃大部切除术后残胃胃上皮性肿瘤的可行性,并根据肿瘤位置和内镜治疗方式比较其临床结局。

方法

我们回顾了 1996 年 1 月至 2013 年 8 月间接受内镜治疗胃大部切除术后残胃胃上皮性肿瘤患者的数据。治疗方法包括内镜下切除或氩等离子凝固术。

结果

本研究共纳入 107 例(中位年龄 65.1 岁;92 例男性)胃大部切除术后残胃 117 例胃肿瘤患者,接受内镜治疗。其中 40 例病变位于吻合口部位,29 例行内镜下切除(72.5%),11 例行氩等离子凝固术(27.5%)。对于 77 例非吻合口部位的病变,68 例行内镜下切除(88.4%),9 例行氩等离子凝固术(11.7%;p=0.031)。吻合口部位组内镜下切除时间明显长于非吻合口部位组(43.6 分钟比 26.3 分钟,p=0.018)。前者 5 例(12.8%)患者复发,后者 1 例(1.3%)患者复发(p=0.015);所有患者均成功采用内镜下切除或 APC 再次治疗。

结论

内镜治疗胃大部切除术后残胃胃上皮性肿瘤是有效且安全的。然而,应密切监测复发情况,尤其是肿瘤位于吻合口部位时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验