Institute of Vertebrate Biology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jan;89(1):207-220. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12962. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
Currently, the deployment of tracking devices is one of the most frequently used approaches to study movement ecology of birds. Recent miniaturization of light-level geolocators enabled studying small bird species whose migratory patterns were widely unknown. However, geolocators may reduce vital rates in tagged birds and may bias obtained movement data. There is a need for a thorough assessment of the potential tag effects on small birds, as previous meta-analyses did not evaluate unpublished data and impact of multiple life-history traits, focused mainly on large species and the number of published studies tagging small birds has increased substantially. We quantitatively reviewed 549 records extracted from 74 published and 48 unpublished studies on over 7,800 tagged and 17,800 control individuals to examine the effects of geolocator tagging on small bird species (body mass <100 g). We calculated the effect of tagging on apparent survival, condition, phenology and breeding performance and identified the most important predictors of the magnitude of effect sizes. Even though the effects were not statistically significant in phylogenetically controlled models, we found a weak negative impact of geolocators on apparent survival. The negative effect on apparent survival was stronger with increasing relative load of the device and with geolocators attached using elastic harnesses. Moreover, tagging effects were stronger in smaller species. In conclusion, we found a weak effect on apparent survival of tagged birds and managed to pinpoint key aspects and drivers of tagging effects. We provide recommendations for establishing matched control group for proper effect size assessment in future studies and outline various aspects of tagging that need further investigation. Finally, our results encourage further use of geolocators on small bird species but the ethical aspects and scientific benefits should always be considered.
目前,追踪设备的部署是研究鸟类运动生态学最常用的方法之一。最近,光强地理定位器的微型化使得研究迁徙模式广泛未知的小型鸟类成为可能。然而,地理定位器可能会降低标记鸟类的重要生存率,并可能对获得的运动数据产生偏差。有必要对地理定位器对小型鸟类的潜在影响进行全面评估,因为之前的元分析没有评估未发表的数据和多个生活史特征的影响,主要集中在大型物种上,标记小型鸟类的已发表研究数量已大大增加。我们定量地审查了从 74 篇已发表和 48 篇未发表的研究中提取的 549 条记录,这些研究涉及超过 7800 只标记和 17800 只对照个体,以研究地理定位器标记对小型鸟类(体重<100 克)的影响。我们计算了标记对明显存活率、状况、物候和繁殖性能的影响,并确定了影响大小的最重要预测因素。尽管在系统发育控制模型中影响不具有统计学意义,但我们发现地理定位器对明显存活率有微弱的负面影响。随着设备相对负荷的增加和使用弹性马具附着的地理定位器,对明显存活率的负面影响会更强。此外,标记效应在较小的物种中更强。总之,我们发现标记鸟类的明显存活率受到微弱影响,并设法确定了标记效应的关键方面和驱动因素。我们为未来的研究提供了建立匹配对照组以适当评估效应大小的建议,并概述了需要进一步调查的标记的各个方面。最后,我们的研究结果鼓励在小型鸟类上进一步使用地理定位器,但应始终考虑伦理方面和科学效益。