Research Department, The Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom; Department of Pathology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Research Department, The Whiteley Clinic, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Mar;7(2):234-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.017.
The study aimed to investigate the biologic effects of the 1470-nm endovenous laser (EVL), with a jacketed fiber and a radial fiber, during EVL ablation of an ex vivo dominant extrafascial tributary of the great saphenous vein in our in vitro model by histology and immunohistochemistry.
Ten segments of the dominant extrafascial tributary of the great saphenous vein were harvested by a consultant vascular surgeon from patients during routine varicose vein surgery. Six segments were treated using an ex vivo model of our design by a 1470-nm EVL with a jacketed fiber. The other four segments were also treated by a 1470-nm EVL but with a radial-firing fiber. Each segment was split into five sections and treated at five different linear endovenous energy densities (LEEDs) at 10 W: 0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 J/cm. The veins were incubated and subsections collected at 6 and 24 hours after treatment. Subsections were immersed in buffered formalin and taken for histologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Histopathologic analysis was then performed.
Treatment with the radial fiber led to a pattern of damage that was more homogeneous than with the jacketed fiber, with no carbonization of tissue present. Significant transmural damage and necrosis were observed at LEEDs of 60 and 80 J/cm in both treatment groups. At the same LEEDs, p53 and caspase 3 analysis showed that transmural cell wall vein death (necrosis or apoptosis) occurred by 6 hours after treatment with both fibers.
There was a significant difference in the effects of treatment with a jacketed fiber and a radial fiber in EVL ablation in vitro. Although both fibers caused transmural vein wall cell death at similar LEEDs, the pattern of damage with the radial fiber was more homogeneous. There was no overtreatment of tissue in terms of carbonization after treatment with the radial fiber. Treatment with the jacketed fiber showed carbonization of tissue at the same LEEDs.
本研究旨在通过组织学和免疫组织化学方法,研究 1470nm 腔内激光(EVL)消融离体大隐静脉外膜优势分支时,带护套光纤和放射状光纤的生物学效应。
由一名顾问血管外科医生从常规静脉曲张手术患者中采集大隐静脉外膜优势分支的 10 段。6 段采用我们设计的离体模型,用带护套纤维的 1470nm EVL 治疗。另外 4 段也用 1470nm EVL 治疗,但用放射状发射纤维。每段分为 5 段,在 10W 时用 5 种不同的线性静脉能量密度(LEED)治疗:0、20、40、60 和 80J/cm。静脉孵育后,在治疗后 6 和 24 小时收集亚段。亚段浸泡在缓冲福尔马林中,进行组织学和免疫组织化学分析。然后进行组织病理学分析。
与带护套纤维相比,放射状纤维导致的损伤模式更均匀,组织无碳化。在两种治疗组中,LEED 为 60 和 80J/cm 时,观察到显著的全层损伤和坏死。在相同的 LEED 下,p53 和 caspase 3 分析表明,在用两种纤维治疗后 6 小时,全层细胞壁静脉死亡(坏死或凋亡)发生。
在离体 EVL 消融中,带护套纤维和放射状纤维的治疗效果有显著差异。虽然两种纤维在相似的 LEED 下都会导致全层静脉壁细胞死亡,但放射状纤维的损伤模式更均匀。在用放射状纤维治疗后,组织没有过度碳化。在相同的 LEED 下,带护套纤维治疗显示组织碳化。