Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Oct;158(4):1007-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.041. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
Our objective was to examine the role of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) aortic dissection repair technique with bare metal stents (BMSs) in abdominal remodeling of residual DeBakey type I aortic dissection.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with chronic aneurysm formation and residual DeBakey type I aortic dissection (ie, original acute aortic dissection DeBakey type I after primary surgical open repair) who underwent arch reoperation with frozen elephant trunk replacement or endovascular debranching with or without an abdominal BMS between December 2006 and December 2016. We analyzed diameters and volumes in 3 dimensions for the true and false lumens of the thoracic and abdominal aorta as well as the thrombosis percentage of the false lumen between the non-BMS (non-PETTICOAT) and BMS (PETTICOAT) groups.
Forty-seven patients who had completed at least 1 year of follow-up were included. The non-BMS (without abdominal BMS) and BMS groups had significant differences in abdominal true lumen diameter and volumetric change at the first postoperative examination and at the examination 1 year after surgery (26.8 mL, median [19.4-34.1 mL, interquartile range (IQR)]) in non-BMS vs 42.5 mL, median [31.1-57.9 mL, IQR]) in BMS (postoperative survey [F test, 33.775; P = .000]) and (30.1 mL, median [20.5-34.1 mL, IQR] in non-BMS vs 46.6 mL, median [31.3-57.4 mL, IQR]) in BMS (12-month survey [F test, 14.001; P = .001]). The abdominal false lumen thrombosis percentage was higher in the BMS group than in the non-BMS group (25.6%, median [16.4%-58.9%, IQR] in non-BMS vs 54.0%, median [36.7%-65.3%, IQR] in the BMS group (F test, 6.318; P = .016).
Following reintervention for chronic residual DeBakey type I aortic dissection, PETTICOAT abdominal dissection BMS effectively expanded the thoracic and abdominal true lumen and augmented false lumen thrombosis percentage during the first postoperative year.
本研究旨在探讨带裸金属支架(BMS)的主动脉夹层假腔临时扩张技术(PETTICOAT)在慢性Ⅰ型主动脉夹层(DeBakey 分型)患者腹主动脉重塑中的作用。
回顾性分析 2006 年 12 月至 2016 年 12 月期间接受冰冻象鼻替换术或分支血管重建术联合或不联合腹主动脉 BMS 的慢性动脉瘤形成和慢性Ⅰ型主动脉夹层(即初次手术开放修复后的急性Ⅰ型主动脉夹层 DeBakey 分型)患者的资料。分析两组患者的胸、腹主动脉真腔和假腔的三维直径和体积以及假腔的血栓形成百分比。
共纳入 47 例患者,随访时间均至少 1 年。非 BMS(无腹主动脉 BMS)组和 BMS 组患者在术后第 1 次检查和术后 1 年检查时的腹主动脉真腔直径和容积变化差异有统计学意义(非 BMS 组为 26.8ml,中位数[19.434.1ml,四分位距(IQR)] vs BMS 组 42.5ml,中位数[31.157.9ml,IQR];术后调查[F 检验,33.775;P=0.000])和(非 BMS 组 30.1ml,中位数[20.534.1ml,IQR] vs BMS 组 46.6ml,中位数[31.357.4ml,IQR];12 个月调查[F 检验,14.001;P=0.001])。BMS 组患者的腹主动脉假腔血栓形成百分比高于非 BMS 组(非 BMS 组 25.6%,中位数[16.4%58.9%,IQR] vs BMS 组 54.0%,中位数[36.7%65.3%,IQR];F 检验,6.318;P=0.016)。
慢性Ⅰ型主动脉夹层患者再次手术后,带 PETTICOAT 腹主动脉 BMS 可有效扩大胸、腹主动脉真腔,增加术后第 1 年的假腔血栓形成百分比。