Sutton Elizabeth, Brewster Liz, Tarrant Carolyn
Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):650-656. doi: 10.1111/hex.12874. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
Ensuring an infection-free environment is increasingly seen as requiring the contribution of staff, patients and visitors. There is limited evidence, however, about how staff feel about collaborating with patients and relatives to co-produce that environment.
This study aims to understand how hospital staff perceive the involvement of patients and relatives in infection prevention and control (IPC) and the main challenges for staff in working together with patients and relatives to reduce the threat of infection.
Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 frontline health-care professionals and four executive staff, from two hospital trusts.
We found that staff were more supportive of approaches that encourage co-operation from patients and relatives, than of interventions that invoked confrontation. We identified challenges to involvement arising from staff concerns about shifting responsibility for IPC onto patients. Staff were not always able to work with patients to control infection risks as some patients themselves created and perpetuated those risks.
Our work highlights that IPC has particular features that impact on the possibilities for involving patients and relatives at the point of care. Staff acknowledge tensions between the drive to involve patients and respect their autonomy, and their duty to protect patients from risk of unseen harm. The role that patients and relatives can play in IPC is fluctuating and context dependent. Staff responsibility for protecting patients from the risk of infection may sometimes need to take priority over prerogatives to involve patients and relatives in the co-production of IPC.
确保无感染环境越来越被视为需要工作人员、患者和访客的共同努力。然而,关于工作人员如何看待与患者及亲属合作以营造这样的环境,相关证据有限。
本研究旨在了解医院工作人员如何看待患者及亲属参与感染预防与控制(IPC),以及工作人员在与患者及亲属共同努力以降低感染威胁方面面临的主要挑战。
对来自两个医院信托机构的35名一线医护专业人员和4名行政人员进行了定性半结构化访谈。
我们发现,与引发对抗的干预措施相比,工作人员更支持鼓励患者及亲属合作的方法。我们确定了工作人员将IPC责任转移给患者所引发的参与挑战。由于一些患者自身制造并延续了感染风险,工作人员并非总能与患者合作以控制感染风险。
我们的研究突出表明,IPC具有一些特殊特征,这些特征影响着在护理点让患者及亲属参与的可能性。工作人员认识到在促使患者参与并尊重其自主权与保护患者免受潜在伤害风险的职责之间存在矛盾。患者及亲属在IPC中所能发挥的作用是变化不定且取决于具体情况的。工作人员保护患者免受感染风险的责任有时可能需要优先于让患者及亲属参与IPC共同生产的特权。