Suppr超能文献

让感染预防与控制成为每个人的事?医院工作人员对患者参与的看法。

Making infection prevention and control everyone's business? Hospital staff views on patient involvement.

作者信息

Sutton Elizabeth, Brewster Liz, Tarrant Carolyn

机构信息

Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):650-656. doi: 10.1111/hex.12874. Epub 2019 Feb 17.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Ensuring an infection-free environment is increasingly seen as requiring the contribution of staff, patients and visitors. There is limited evidence, however, about how staff feel about collaborating with patients and relatives to co-produce that environment.

AIMS

This study aims to understand how hospital staff perceive the involvement of patients and relatives in infection prevention and control (IPC) and the main challenges for staff in working together with patients and relatives to reduce the threat of infection.

METHODS

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 35 frontline health-care professionals and four executive staff, from two hospital trusts.

FINDINGS

We found that staff were more supportive of approaches that encourage co-operation from patients and relatives, than of interventions that invoked confrontation. We identified challenges to involvement arising from staff concerns about shifting responsibility for IPC onto patients. Staff were not always able to work with patients to control infection risks as some patients themselves created and perpetuated those risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work highlights that IPC has particular features that impact on the possibilities for involving patients and relatives at the point of care. Staff acknowledge tensions between the drive to involve patients and respect their autonomy, and their duty to protect patients from risk of unseen harm. The role that patients and relatives can play in IPC is fluctuating and context dependent. Staff responsibility for protecting patients from the risk of infection may sometimes need to take priority over prerogatives to involve patients and relatives in the co-production of IPC.

摘要

背景

确保无感染环境越来越被视为需要工作人员、患者和访客的共同努力。然而,关于工作人员如何看待与患者及亲属合作以营造这样的环境,相关证据有限。

目的

本研究旨在了解医院工作人员如何看待患者及亲属参与感染预防与控制(IPC),以及工作人员在与患者及亲属共同努力以降低感染威胁方面面临的主要挑战。

方法

对来自两个医院信托机构的35名一线医护专业人员和4名行政人员进行了定性半结构化访谈。

结果

我们发现,与引发对抗的干预措施相比,工作人员更支持鼓励患者及亲属合作的方法。我们确定了工作人员将IPC责任转移给患者所引发的参与挑战。由于一些患者自身制造并延续了感染风险,工作人员并非总能与患者合作以控制感染风险。

结论

我们的研究突出表明,IPC具有一些特殊特征,这些特征影响着在护理点让患者及亲属参与的可能性。工作人员认识到在促使患者参与并尊重其自主权与保护患者免受潜在伤害风险的职责之间存在矛盾。患者及亲属在IPC中所能发挥的作用是变化不定且取决于具体情况的。工作人员保护患者免受感染风险的责任有时可能需要优先于让患者及亲属参与IPC共同生产的特权。

相似文献

1
Making infection prevention and control everyone's business? Hospital staff views on patient involvement.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):650-656. doi: 10.1111/hex.12874. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
2
Healthcare staff's views on the patients' prerequisites to be co-creator in preventing healthcare-associated infections.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Jun;34(2):314-321. doi: 10.1111/scs.12730. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
TB infection prevention and control experiences of South African nurses--a phenomenological study.
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 25;11:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-262.
4
Potential of innovations in hygiene management - a managerial perspective.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Jun 14;8:100. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0555-x. eCollection 2019.
5
Home Health Staff Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control: Implications for Coronavirus Disease 2019.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Dec;21(12):1782-1790.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
7
Adoption of infection prevention and control practices by healthcare workers in Québec: A qualitative study.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):1361-1366. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.269. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
10
Defining the user role in infection control.
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Apr;92(4):321-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive mapping: Enhancing discussions in the transdisciplinary design and health research space?
Des J (Aldershot). 2025 Jun 26:1-21. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2025.2510800.
2
A call to action: the SHEA research agenda to combat healthcare-associated infections.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 25;45(9):1-18. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.125.
6
Do patients need advice and information to prevent infections - results of a single centre structured survey.
Infect Prev Pract. 2022 Aug 1;4(4):100237. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100237. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
A qualitative study of nurse-patient communication and information provision during surgical pre-admission clinics.
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1357-1366. doi: 10.1111/hex.13270. Epub 2021 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Coproduction of healthcare service.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jul;25(7):509-17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Patient Involvement in Patient Safety: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Staff and Patient Perceptions.
J Patient Saf. 2017 Jun;13(2):82-87. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000123.
5
Patient empowerment and hand hygiene, 1997-2012.
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Jul;84(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
6
The role of patients and their relatives in 'speaking up' about their own safety - a qualitative study of acute illness.
Health Expect. 2015 Jun;18(3):392-405. doi: 10.1111/hex.12044. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
7
Patient narratives of surgical site infection: implications for practice.
J Hosp Infect. 2013 Jan;83(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.07.025. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Patients' willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: a systematic literature review.
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(2):257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.056. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
10
Involving the patient to ask about hospital hand hygiene: a National Patient Safety Agency feasibility study.
J Hosp Infect. 2011 Apr;77(4):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.10.013. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验