Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):597-602. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1584256. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
: Dual sequential defibrillation (DSD) - successive defibrillations with two defibrillators - offers a novel approach to refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF) and tachycardia (VF/VT). While associated with rescue shock success, the effect of DSD upon out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unknown. We evaluated the association of DSD with survival after refractory VF/VT OHCA. : We used data from a large metropolitan fire-based EMS service. We included all adult OHCA during 2013-2016 with ≥3 standard defibrillations. Physicians authorized subsequent DSD use by two separate defibrillators (PhysioControl LIFEPAK® 12/15) with pads placed anterior-lateral and anterior-posterior. Evaluated outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, survival to 72 hours, and survival to hospital discharge. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association between defibrillation type and OHCA outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics and event characteristics. : We included 310 patients in the analysis, 71 patients receiving DSD and 239 receiving conventional defibrillation. Patient demographics and event characteristics were similar between both groups. ROSC was lower for DSD than standard defibrillation: 39.4% vs. 60.3%, adjusted OR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.25-0.87). There were no differences in survival to hospital admission (35.2% vs. 49.2%, adjusted OR 0.57 [95% CI: 0.30-1.08]), survival to 72 hours (21.4% vs. 32.3%, adjusted OR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.26-1.10]), or survival to hospital discharge (14.3% vs. 20.9%, adjusted OR 0.63 [95% CI: 0.27-1.45]). : Compared with conventional defibrillation, DSD was associated with lower odds of prehospital ROSC. Defibrillation type was not associated with other OHCA endpoints. DSD may not be beneficial in refractory VF/VT OHCA.
: 双次顺序除颤(DSD)——使用两个除颤器进行连续除颤——为难治性心室颤动(VF)和心动过速(VF/VT)提供了一种新方法。虽然与抢救性电击成功相关,但 DSD 对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了 DSD 与难治性 VF/VT OHCA 后生存率的关系。
: 我们使用了来自一个大型城市消防急救服务机构的数据。我们纳入了 2013 年至 2016 年期间所有≥3 次标准除颤的成年 OHCA 患者。医生使用两个单独的除颤器(PhysioControl LIFEPAK® 12/15)授权后续 DSD 使用,电极片分别置于前外侧和前-后位。评估的结果包括自主循环恢复(ROSC)、存活至入院、存活至 72 小时和存活至出院。我们使用多变量逻辑回归,调整了患者人口统计学和事件特征后,评估了除颤类型与 OHCA 结局之间的关系。
: 我们共纳入 310 例患者进行分析,其中 71 例接受 DSD,239 例接受常规除颤。两组患者的人口统计学和事件特征相似。DSD 的 ROSC 低于标准除颤:39.4% vs. 60.3%,调整后的比值比 0.46(95%可信区间:0.25-0.87)。存活至入院无差异(35.2% vs. 49.2%,调整后的比值比 0.57 [95%可信区间:0.30-1.08]),存活至 72 小时(21.4% vs. 32.3%,调整后的比值比 0.52 [95%可信区间:0.26-1.10])或存活至出院(14.3% vs. 20.9%,调整后的比值比 0.63 [95%可信区间:0.27-1.45])。
: 与常规除颤相比,DSD 与院前 ROSC 的可能性降低相关。除颤类型与其他 OHCA 终点无关。DSD 在难治性 VF/VT OHCA 中可能无益。