Zhu Shuyu, Allitt Benjamin, Samuel Anil, Lui Leo, Rosa Marcello G P, Rajan Ramesh
Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Physiology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Australian Research Council, Centre of Excellence in Integrative Brain Function, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Feb 1;13:5. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00005. eCollection 2019.
Based on anatomical connectivity and basic response characteristics, primate auditory cortex is divided into a central core surrounded by belt and parabelt regions. The encoding of pitch, a prototypical element of sound identity, has been studied in primary auditory cortex (A1) but little is known about how it is encoded and represented beyond A1. The caudal auditory belt and parabelt cortical fields process spatial information but also contain information on non-spatial aspects of sounds. In this study, we examined neuronal responses in these areas to pitch-varied marmoset vocalizations, to derive the consequent representation of pitch in these regions and the potential underlying mechanisms, to compare to the encoding and representation of pitch of the same sounds in A1. With respect to response patterns to the vocalizations, neurons in caudal medial belt (CM) showed similar short-latency and short-duration response patterns to A1, but caudal lateral belt (CL) neurons at the same hierarchical level and caudal parabelt (CPB) neurons at a higher hierarchical level showed delayed or much delayed response onset and prolonged response durations. With respect to encoding of pitch, neurons in all cortical fields showed sensitivity to variations in the vocalization pitch either through modulation of spike-count or of first spike-latency. The utility of the encoding mechanism differed between fields: pitch sensitivity was reliably represented by spike-count variations in A1 and CM, while first spike-latency variation was better for encoding pitch in CL and CPB. In summary, our data show that (a) the traditionally-defined belt area CM is functionally very similar to A1 with respect to the representation and encoding of complex naturalistic sounds, (b) the CL belt area, at the same hierarchical level as CM, and the CPB area, at a higher hierarchical level, have very different response patterns and appear to use different pitch-encoding mechanisms, and (c) caudal auditory fields, proposed to be specialized for encoding spatial location, can also contain robust representations of sound identity.
基于解剖学上的连接性和基本反应特性,灵长类动物的听觉皮层被分为一个中央核心区域,其周围环绕着带状区域和旁带状区域。音高作为声音特征的一个典型元素,其编码已在初级听觉皮层(A1)中得到研究,但对于A1之外的区域如何编码和表征音高,人们了解甚少。听觉皮层尾部的带状区域和旁带状区域处理空间信息,但也包含有关声音非空间方面的信息。在本研究中,我们检测了这些区域中神经元对音高变化的狨猴叫声的反应,以得出这些区域中随之产生的音高表征及潜在的基础机制,并与A1中相同声音的音高编码和表征进行比较。关于对叫声的反应模式,尾内侧带状区(CM)的神经元表现出与A1相似的短潜伏期和短持续时间的反应模式,但同一层级的尾外侧带状区(CL)神经元和更高层级的尾旁带状区(CPB)神经元表现出延迟或大幅延迟的反应起始和延长的反应持续时间。关于音高编码,所有皮层区域的神经元都通过发放率或首次发放潜伏期的调制,表现出对叫声音高变化的敏感性。编码机制的效用在不同区域有所不同:A1和CM中的发放率变化可靠地代表了音高敏感性,而首次发放潜伏期变化在CL和CPB中更适合用于编码音高。总之,我们的数据表明:(a)传统定义的带状区域CM在复杂自然声音的表征和编码方面在功能上与A1非常相似;(b)与CM处于同一层级的CL带状区域以及更高层级的CPB区域,具有非常不同的反应模式,并且似乎使用不同的音高编码机制;(c)被认为专门用于编码空间位置的听觉皮层尾部区域,也可以包含对声音特征的强大表征。