Lichnog Charlotte, Klabunde Sha, Becker Emily, Fuh Franklin, Tripal Philipp, Atreya Raja, Klenske Entcho, Erickson Rich, Chiu Henry, Reed Chae, Chung Shan, Neufert Clemens, Atreya Imke, McBride Jacqueline, Neurath Markus F, Zundler Sebastian
Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kussmaul Campus for Medical Research and Translational Research Center, Erlangen, Germany.
OMNI Biomarker Development, Development Sciences, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 1;10:39. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00039. eCollection 2019.
Anti-integrin therapy is a new frontline strategy in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The anti-β7 integrin antibody etrolizumab is currently being investigated for safety and efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in several phase III trials. Mechanistically, etrolizumab is known to block β7 integrin ligand binding and reduces intestinal trafficking of β7-expressing cells. Etrolizumab blocks β7 integrin ligand binding and reduces β7-positive lymphocyte migration and retention in the inflamed gut mucosa, but the exact mechanisms by which this inhibition occurs are not fully understood. Cellular effects of etrolizumab or etrolizumab surrogate antibody (etrolizumab-s) were investigated in cell culture models and analyzed by flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, ImageStream, stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and functional dynamic adhesion assays. Moreover, effects on α4β7 integrin were compared with the pharmacodynamically similar antibody vedolizumab. As demonstrated by several different approaches, etrolizumab and etrolizumab-s treatment led to internalization of β7 integrin. This resulted in impaired dynamic adhesion to MAdCAM-1. Internalized β7 integrin localized in endosomes and re-expression of β7 was dependent on protein synthesis. etrolizumab treatment did not lead to cellular activation or cytokine secretion and did not induce cytotoxicity. Internalization of α4β7 integrin was increased with etrolizumab compared with vedolizumab. Our data suggest that etrolizumab does not elicit secondary effector functions on the single cell level. Integrin internalization may be an important mechanism of action of etrolizumab, which might explain some but not all immunological effects observed with etrolizumab.
抗整合素疗法是治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)的一种新的一线策略。抗β7整合素抗体etrolizumab目前正在多项III期试验中研究其在克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中的安全性和疗效。从机制上讲,已知etrolizumab可阻断β7整合素配体结合并减少表达β7的细胞在肠道中的运输。Etrolizumab可阻断β7整合素配体结合并减少β7阳性淋巴细胞在炎症性肠黏膜中的迁移和滞留,但这种抑制发生的确切机制尚不完全清楚。在细胞培养模型中研究了etrolizumab或etrolizumab替代抗体(etrolizumab-s)的细胞效应,并通过流式细胞术、荧光显微镜、图像流式细胞仪、受激发射损耗(STED)显微镜和功能动态黏附试验进行分析。此外,将对α4β7整合素的影响与药效学相似的抗体维多珠单抗进行了比较。几种不同方法的结果表明,etrolizumab和etrolizumab-s治疗导致β7整合素内化。这导致对黏膜地址素细胞黏附分子-1(MAdCAM-1)的动态黏附受损。内化的β7整合素定位于内体,β7的重新表达依赖于蛋白质合成。Etrolizumab治疗不会导致细胞活化或细胞因子分泌,也不会诱导细胞毒性。与维多珠单抗相比,etrolizumab可增加α4β7整合素的内化。我们的数据表明,etrolizumab在单细胞水平上不会引发次级效应功能。整合素内化可能是etrolizumab的重要作用机制,这可能解释了etrolizumab观察到的部分而非全部免疫效应。