Meessen Jennifer M T A, Fiocco Marta, Leichtenberg Claudia S, Vliet Vlieland Thea P M, Slagboom P Eline, Nelissen Rob G H H
Department of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019 Feb 4;10:2151459318808164. doi: 10.1177/2151459318808164. eCollection 2019.
Up to 33% and 25% of patients with end-stage hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) are considered frail by the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI). This study aims to assess whether frail patients have lower functional gains after arthroplasty and to assess GFI as a tool to discriminate between good and adverse change score.
Patients with end-stage hip/knee OA scheduled for arthroplasty were recruited from the . Functional outcome was measured as change score on the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS/KOOS), by subtracting preoperative score from 1-year postsurgery score and then dichotomized based on a cutoff of 20 points. For each HOOS/KOOS subscale, 3 models were estimated: GFI univariate (model 1), GFI and baseline score (model 2), and baseline score univariate (model 3). A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the discriminative ability of each model.
Eight hundred five patients with end-stage hip OA (31.4% frail) and 640 patients with end-stage knee OA (25.4% frail) were included. Frail patients were older, had a higher body mass index, had more comorbidities, and lived more often alone. Persons considered frail by GFI had significant lower baseline score; however, except for "function in sports and recreation" and "quality of life," change scores were similar in frail and nonfrail persons. The discriminatory value of GFI was negligible for all HOOS/KOOS subscales. Baseline score, however, was adequate to discriminate between total knee arthroplasty patients with more or less than twice the minimally clinically important difference on KOOS symptoms subscale (area under the curve = 0.802).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Although frail patients with OA have lower functioning scores at baseline, the change scores on HOOS/KOOS subscales are similar for both frail and nonfrail patients. Exploring other heath assessements may improve patient-specific outcome prediction.
根据格罗宁根衰弱指标(GFI),高达33%的终末期髋关节骨关节炎(OA)患者和25%的终末期膝关节骨关节炎患者被认为身体虚弱。本研究旨在评估虚弱患者在关节置换术后功能改善是否较差,并评估GFI作为区分良好和不良变化评分工具的有效性。
从……招募计划接受关节置换术的终末期髋/膝OA患者。功能结局以髋骨关节炎结局评分/膝骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS/KOOS)的变化评分来衡量,即从术后1年评分中减去术前评分,然后根据20分的临界值进行二分法划分。对于每个HOOS/KOOS子量表,估计了3个模型:GFI单变量模型(模型1)、GFI和基线评分模型(模型2)以及基线评分单变量模型(模型3)。进行了受试者工作特征分析,以评估每个模型的判别能力。
纳入了805例终末期髋关节OA患者(31.4%身体虚弱)和640例终末期膝关节OA患者(25.4%身体虚弱)。虚弱患者年龄更大,体重指数更高,合并症更多,且独居的情况更常见。被GFI判定为虚弱的患者基线评分显著更低;然而,除了“运动和娱乐功能”以及“生活质量”外,虚弱和非虚弱患者的变化评分相似。对于所有HOOS/KOOS子量表,GFI的判别价值可忽略不计。然而,基线评分足以区分膝关节置换术后KOOS症状子量表上变化或多或少为最小临床重要差异两倍的患者(曲线下面积 = 0.802)。
讨论/结论:尽管OA虚弱患者基线时功能评分较低,但HOOS/KOOS子量表的变化评分在虚弱和非虚弱患者中相似。探索其他健康评估方法可能会改善针对患者个体的结局预测。