Bateman Antony H, Larouche Jeremie, Goldstein Christina L, Sciubba Daniel M, Choma Theodore J, Lawrence Brandon, Cheng Joseph, Fehlings Michael G, Paquette Scott J, Yee Albert J M
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/2192568217747574. Epub 2018 May 10.
Longitudinal survey.
It remains important to align competence-based objectives for training as deemed important by clinical fellows to those of their fellowship supervisors and program educators. The primary aim of this study was to determine trainee views on the relative importance of specific procedural training competencies. Secondarily, we aimed to evaluate self-perceived confidence in procedural performance at the commencement and completion of fellowship.
Questionnaires were administered to 68 clinical fellows enrolled in the AOSNA fellowship program during the 2015-2016 academic year. A Likert-type scale was used to quantify trainee perspectives on the relative importance of specific procedural competencies to their training base on an established curriculum including 53 general and 22 focused/advanced procedural competencies. We measured trainee self-perceived confidence in performing procedures at the commencement and completion of their program. Statistical analysis was performed on fellow demographic data and procedural responses.
Our initial survey response rate was 82% (56/68) and 69% (47/68) for the follow-up survey. Although most procedural competencies were regarded of high importance, we did identify several procedures of high importance yet low confidence among fellows (ie, upper cervical, thoracic discectomy surgery), which highlights an educational opportunity. Overall procedural confidence increased from an average Likert score of 4.2 (SD = 1.3) on the initial survey to 5.4 (SD = 0.8) by follow-up survey ( < .0001).
Understanding trainee goals for clinical fellowship remains important. Identification of areas of low procedural confidence and high importance to training experience will better guide fellowship programs and supervisors in the strategic delivery of the educational experience.
纵向调查。
将临床学员认为重要的基于能力的培训目标与他们的导师和项目教育工作者的目标保持一致仍然很重要。本研究的主要目的是确定学员对特定程序培训能力相对重要性的看法。其次,我们旨在评估学员在进修开始和结束时对程序操作的自我感知信心。
对2015 - 2016学年参加AOSNA进修项目的68名临床学员进行问卷调查。采用李克特量表来量化学员对特定程序能力相对于其基于既定课程的培训的相对重要性的看法,该课程包括53项一般程序能力和22项重点/高级程序能力。我们测量了学员在项目开始和结束时对执行程序的自我感知信心。对学员的人口统计学数据和程序回答进行了统计分析。
我们的初始调查回复率为82%(56/68),后续调查为69%(47/68)。虽然大多数程序能力被认为非常重要,但我们确实发现学员中存在一些重要性高但信心低的程序(即上颈椎、胸椎椎间盘切除术),这突出了一个教育机会。总体程序信心从初始调查的平均李克特评分为4.2(标准差 = 1.3)增加到后续调查的5.4(标准差 = 0.8)(P <.0001)。
了解学员的临床进修目标仍然很重要。识别程序信心低但对培训经验重要性高的领域将更好地指导进修项目和导师进行有策略的教育体验。