Eastlack Robert K, Srinivas Ravi, Mundis Gregory M, Nguyen Stacie, Mummaneni Praveen V, Okonkwo David O, Kanter Adam S, Anand Neel, Park Paul, Nunley Pierce, Uribe Juan S, Akbarnia Behrooz A, Chou Dean, Deviren Vedat
Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
San Diego Spine Foundation, San Diego, CA, USA.
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):41-47. doi: 10.1177/2192568218761032. Epub 2018 May 10.
A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database.
We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques.
Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20°, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10°. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, ≥3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included.
A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, = .04).
Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.
对一个成人脊柱畸形数据库进行多中心回顾性研究。
我们旨在描述采用全椎弓根螺钉内固定微创(cMIS)和混合(HYB)技术进行成人脊柱畸形手术的再次手术率及病因。
纳入标准为年龄≥18岁,且符合以下条件之一:冠状面Cobb角>20°、矢状面垂直轴>5cm、骨盆倾斜>20°、骨盆入射角-腰椎前凸角>10°。纳入接受cMIS或HYB手术、治疗节段≥3个且随访至少2年的患者。
共有133例患者符合本研究的纳入标准(65例HYB手术患者和68例cMIS手术患者)。在HYB组中,交界区失败(13.8%)是再次手术最常见的原因,而在cMIS组中,内固定失败是最常见的原因(14.7%)。HYB组近端交界区失败(PJF)的发生率高于远端交界区失败(DJF)(12.3%对3.1%),但与cMIS组相比,PJF或DJF发生率无显著差异。早期(<30天)再次手术比晚期(>30天)再次手术少见(cMIS组=1.5%;HYB组=6.1%),但在倾向得分匹配后,HYB组早期再次手术更常见,主要是由于感染率(10.8%对0%,P=0.04)。
在至少2年的随访中,采用cMIS和HYB技术矫正成人脊柱畸形的总体再次手术率分别为27.9%和33.8%。HYB手术方式后交界区失败更常见,而cMIS技术中假关节/内固定失败更常发生。两组中早期再次手术均比后期返回手术室少见,但与HYB组相比,cMIS组感染和早期再次手术的风险更低。