Suppr超能文献

导航问题、评估地点以及练习测试对阿尔茨海默病患者驾驶评估表现的影响。

Effect of Navigation Problems, Assessment Location, and a Practice Test on Driving Assessment Performance for People with Alzheimer's Disease.

机构信息

School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Austin Health, Heidelberg West, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(3):1035-1043. doi: 10.3233/JAD-181069.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with Alzheimer's disease may be required to undertake clinical and on-road assessments to determine fitness to drive. The manner in which on-road assessments are conducted with drivers who do and do not have navigational problems may affect the outcome.

OBJECTIVES

Investigate the effect of 1) navigational difficulties, 2) location of assessment (un/familiar area) and assessment order, and 3) undertaking a second assessment (practice), on passing an on-road driving assessment.

METHODS

Forty-three drivers undertook an Occupational Therapy-Driver Assessment Off Road Assessment (OT-DORA) Battery which included the Drive Home Maze Test (DHMT). Participants with/without a history of navigational problems were randomly allocated into three groups: 1) Unfamiliar/then familiar area assessment; 2) Unfamiliar/unfamiliar; 3) familiar/unfamiliar. An on-road assessment protocol was used including over 100 expected behaviors at nominated points along the directed route. For familiar area assessments, the driver self-navigated from their home to shops and services. A pass/fail decision was made for each assessment.

RESULTS

A generalized linear mixed effects model showed neither location, nor practice affected passing the on-road assessment. Participants with navigational problems were six times less likely to pass regardless of route familiarity and direction method, and the DHMT was a significant negative predictor of passing.

CONCLUSION

Drivers with Alzheimer's disease who have navigational problems and are slow to complete the DHMT are unlikely to pass an on-road assessment. However, navigation and maze completion skills may be a proxy for an underlying cognitive skill underpinning driving performance.

摘要

背景

患有老年痴呆症的人可能需要进行临床和路考评估,以确定其驾驶能力。对于有和没有导航问题的驾驶员,路考的进行方式可能会影响评估结果。

目的

研究 1)导航困难、2)评估地点(熟悉/不熟悉区域)和评估顺序以及 3)进行第二次评估(练习)对通过路考的影响。

方法

43 名驾驶员进行了职业治疗师-驾驶评估场外评估(OT-DORA)电池测试,其中包括回家迷宫测试(DHMT)。有/无导航问题史的参与者被随机分为三组:1)不熟悉/然后熟悉区域评估;2)不熟悉/不熟悉;3)熟悉/不熟悉。使用了路考评估方案,包括在指定路线点的 100 多个预期行为。对于熟悉区域的评估,驾驶员从自己的家导航到商店和服务。每个评估都做出通过/不通过的决定。

结果

广义线性混合效应模型显示,地点和练习都不会影响路考的通过。无论路线熟悉程度和方向方法如何,有导航问题的参与者通过的可能性要低六倍,并且 DHMT 是通过的显著负预测因子。

结论

患有老年痴呆症且有导航问题且完成 DHMT 速度较慢的驾驶员不太可能通过路考。然而,导航和迷宫完成技能可能是驾驶表现背后潜在认知技能的替代指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验