• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定颊牙槽鳞状细胞癌的最佳手术切缘。

Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Head & Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1033-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224
PMID:30777600
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical margin is one of the most important prognostic factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. There have been studies which refute the standard practice of considering 5 mm (mm) margin as free. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the impact of each mm of margin on the local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and to obtain a cut-off value which would impact the survival the most.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 602 treatment naïve patients of buccoalveolar complex cancer. ROC curve was plotted for each millimetre of margin to derive the cut-off margin for maximum LRFS. Multivariate analysis was done for the margin groups to calculate the margin beyond which no significant improvement on LRFS was achieved. Early and advanced tumors were also evaluated separately.

RESULTS

A cut off margin of 5.5 mm was achieved on ROC for early (T1-T2) tumors and 6.5 mm cut off was achieved for advanced (T3-T4) tumors. Based on these cut off different margin groups were made. The cohort was grouped into positive margin, 1-5.5 mm, 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm. Hazard ratio for patients with 1-5.5 mm and positive margin was 1.886 (95%CI, 1.15 to 3.09) and 5.58 (95%CI, 1.75 to 17.78) respectively. HR for margin 5.5 mm to 7 mm was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.06). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between margin groups of 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm (p < 0.589) for both early and advanced tumors.

CONCLUSION

Minimum surgical margins of 5.5 mm in the final histopathology should be aimed for in the bucco-alveolar carcinomas. There was significant improvement in LRFS with increasing margins upto 7 mm. Taking margins beyond 7 mm does not improve LRFS.

摘要

简介

手术切缘是口腔鳞状细胞癌最重要的预后因素之一。有研究否定了将 5 毫米(mm)作为无切缘的标准做法。因此,我们旨在评估切缘每增加 1 毫米(mm)对局部无复发生存(LRFS)的影响,并得出对生存影响最大的切点值。

材料和方法

这是一项对 602 例初治颊牙槽复合体癌患者的回顾性研究。为获得最大 LRFS 的切点切缘,为每毫米(mm)的切缘绘制 ROC 曲线。对切缘组进行多变量分析,以计算 LRFS 无显著改善的切缘。还分别评估了早期和晚期肿瘤。

结果

ROC 分析得出,早期(T1-T2)肿瘤的切点切缘为 5.5mm,晚期(T3-T4)肿瘤的切点切缘为 6.5mm。基于这些切点值,将不同的切缘组分组。该队列分为阳性切缘、1-5.5mm、5.6-7mm 和>7mm。1-5.5mm 和阳性切缘的患者危险比分别为 1.886(95%CI,1.15-3.09)和 5.58(95%CI,1.75-17.78)。5.5mm-7mm 切缘的 HR 为 1.15(95%CI,1.15-2.06)。对于早期和晚期肿瘤,5.6-7mm 和>7mm 切缘组之间的生存率无统计学差异(p>0.589)。

结论

在颊牙槽癌中,最终病理的最小手术切缘应为 5.5mm。LRFS 随着切缘增加至 7mm 而显著改善。超过 7mm 的切缘不会改善 LRFS。

相似文献

1
Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.确定颊牙槽鳞状细胞癌的最佳手术切缘。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;45(6):1033-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
2
The relevance of surgical margins in clinically early oral squamous cell carcinoma.手术切缘在临床早期口腔鳞状细胞癌中的相关性。
Oral Oncol. 2020 Nov;110:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104913. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
3
Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.口腔及口咽鳞状细胞癌标本导向的术中切缘评估。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jun 21;50(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00501-5.
4
A Proposal to Redefine Close Surgical Margins in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue.关于重新定义舌鳞状细胞癌手术切缘的提议。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 1;143(6):555-560. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.4238.
5
Impact of dysplastic surgical margins for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.口腔鳞状细胞癌患者的手术不典型边缘的影响。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Oct;97:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
6
Incidence, predictors and impact of positive bony margins in surgically treated T4 stage cancers of the oral cavity.口腔 T4 期癌症手术治疗中阳性骨切缘的发生率、预测因素和影响。
Oral Oncol. 2019 Mar;90:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Independent Predictors of Prognosis Based on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgical Margins.基于口腔鳞状细胞癌手术切缘的预后独立预测因子。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Oct;159(4):675-682. doi: 10.1177/0194599818773070. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
Positive surgical margins in early stage oral cavity cancer: an analysis of 20,602 cases.早期口腔癌手术切缘阳性:20602例病例分析
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec;151(6):984-90. doi: 10.1177/0194599814551718. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
9
Optimum surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: Is the current definition adequate?口腔舌鳞癌的最佳手术切缘:目前的定义是否足够?
Oral Oncol. 2020 Dec;111:104938. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104938. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Association of Main Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status With Local Recurrence and Survival in Oral Cancer Surgery.口腔癌手术中主标本和肿瘤床切缘状态与局部复发和生存的关系。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 1;142(12):1191-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2329.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment and interpretation of the status of surgical margins following resective surgery for head and neck squamous cancer: a narrative review.头颈部鳞状细胞癌切除术后手术切缘状态的评估与解读:一项叙述性综述
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 26;23(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03993-x.
2
Impact of Close Margins on Oral Cancer Outcomes According to the Oral Subsite.根据口腔亚部位分析切缘接近对口腔癌预后的影响
Head Neck. 2025 Apr;47(4):1176-1184. doi: 10.1002/hed.28024. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3
Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌的手术切缘:一篇叙述性综述。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3680-3700. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001306.
4
Stratification of surgical margin distances by the millimeter on local recurrence in oral cavity cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.口腔癌局部复发的手术切缘距离毫米分层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Head Neck. 2023 May;45(5):1305-1314. doi: 10.1002/hed.27339. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
5
The impact of intraoperative frozen section analysis on final resection margin status, recurrence, and patient outcome with oral squamous cell carcinoma.术中冰冻切片分析对口腔鳞状细胞癌最终切缘状态、复发和患者预后的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6769-6777. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03964-y. Epub 2021 May 6.
6
Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer Using Label-Free Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging and Machine Learning.使用无标记荧光寿命成像和机器学习评估口腔和口咽癌的术中切缘。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Mar;68(3):857-868. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2020.3010480. Epub 2021 Feb 18.