• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术与联合睫状体光凝术治疗慢性闭角型青光眼的手术效果比较。

Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification/goniosynechialysis with and without endocyclophotocoagulation in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tulane School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;67(3):366-370. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_895_18.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_895_18
PMID:30777954
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6407387/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare surgical outcomes of patients after phacoemulsification with goniosynechialysis (phaco/GSL) versus phaco with GSL and endocyclophotocoagulation (phaco/GSL/ECP) in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma (CACG) through 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative case series was performed. Patients with CACG who underwent phaco in combination with either GSL alone (group 1) or GSL with ECP with intracameral injection of kenalog (group 2) from 2011 to 2018 were included. Group 1 included 6 eyes of 6 patients and group 2 included 11 eyes of 10 patients. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (RSA). Primary outcome measures included changes in intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity (VA), failure based on IOP (>18 or <6 mmHg at 1 year), and secondary operative procedures and complication rates. Data were analyzed using a paired two-tailed T-test.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative IOP decreased from 23.5 ± 11.2 to 14.2 ± 2.4 mmHg (P < 0.0073) in group 1 and 24.4 ± 8.2 to 14.5 ± 2.7 mmHg (P < 0.0001) in group 2. The mean % IOP reduction was 33.7% in group 1 and 34.2% in group 2. The mean improvement in VA (logMAR units) was 0.24 (P = 0.085) in group 1 and 0.13 (P = 0.657) in group 2. The mean number of topical meds decreased from 2.50 ± 1.76 to 1.80 ± 1.64 in group 1 (P = 0.513) and from 2.82 ± 1.25 to 1.17 ± 0.98 in group 2 (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Phaco/GSL and phaco/GSL/ECP both achieve a significant reduction in IOP without the complications associated with traditional glaucoma filtration surgeries.

摘要

目的

通过 12 个月的随访,比较超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术(phaco/GSL)与超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术和眼内光凝术(phaco/GSL/ECP)治疗慢性闭角型青光眼(CACG)患者的手术效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性、非随机、对照病例系列研究。纳入 2011 年至 2018 年间接受超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术(GSL)(第 1 组)或房角分离术联合眼内光凝术和玻璃体内注射曲安奈德(GSL/ECP)(第 2 组)治疗的 CACG 患者。第 1 组包括 6 例 6 眼,第 2 组包括 10 例 11 眼。所有手术均由同一位外科医生(RSA)完成。主要观察指标包括眼压(IOP)、视力(VA)的变化、IOP 失败(1 年后眼压>18mmHg 或<6mmHg)以及二次手术和并发症发生率。数据采用配对双侧 t 检验进行分析。

结果

第 1 组患者术前平均 IOP 从 23.5 ± 11.2mmHg 降至 14.2 ± 2.4mmHg(P<0.0073),第 2 组患者术前平均 IOP 从 24.4 ± 8.2mmHg 降至 14.5 ± 2.7mmHg(P<0.0001)。第 1 组患者 IOP 平均降低 33.7%,第 2 组患者 IOP 平均降低 34.2%。第 1 组患者 VA 平均提高 0.24(logMAR 单位)(P=0.085),第 2 组患者 VA 平均提高 0.13(P=0.657)。第 1 组患者平均点眼药物种类从 2.50 ± 1.76 降至 1.80 ± 1.64(P=0.513),第 2 组患者平均点眼药物种类从 2.82 ± 1.25 降至 1.17 ± 0.98(P=0.014)。

结论

超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术和超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术和眼内光凝术均可显著降低 IOP,且不会产生传统青光眼滤过手术相关的并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd5/6407387/0536fc9ff098/IJO-67-366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd5/6407387/0536fc9ff098/IJO-67-366-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd5/6407387/0536fc9ff098/IJO-67-366-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification/goniosynechialysis with and without endocyclophotocoagulation in patients with chronic angle closure glaucoma.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术与联合睫状体光凝术治疗慢性闭角型青光眼的手术效果比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;67(3):366-370. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_895_18.
2
Outcomes of chronic angle-closure glaucoma treated by phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with or without endoscopically goniosynechialysis.采用超声乳化白内障吸除术联合睫状体光凝术(伴或不伴内镜下房角粘连分离术)治疗慢性闭角型青光眼的疗效
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;15(8):1273-1278. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.08.08. eCollection 2022.
3
Differential Efficacy of Combined Phacoemulsification and Endocyclophotocoagulation in Open-angle Glaucoma Versus Angle-closure Glaucoma.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合眼内光凝术治疗开角型青光眼与闭角型青光眼的疗效差异。
J Glaucoma. 2019 May;28(5):473-480. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001225.
4
Lens extraction for chronic angle-closure glaucoma.白内障超声乳化术联合房角分离术治疗慢性闭角型青光眼
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 24;3(3):CD005555. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005555.pub3.
5
Comparative Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Alone versus Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术与单纯超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的随机对照研究
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Sep-Oct;2(5):346-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
6
Long-term efficacy of goniosynechialysis combined with phacoemulsification for primary angle closure.房角分离联合超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的长期疗效。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;251(3):825-30. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2091-8. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparing Phacoemulsification Combined with goniosynechialysis to other mainstream procedures in treating patients with angle-closure glaucoma.超声乳化联合房角粘连分离术与其他主流手术治疗闭角型青光眼患者的系统评价和Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(42):e17654. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017654.
8
Outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with two iStent inject trabecular microbypass stents with or without endocyclophotocoagulation.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合使用或不联合使用内路环光凝的两种 iStent inject 小梁微旁路引流植入物的效果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;104(10):1378-1383. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315434. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment by Anterior-segment Optical Coherence Tomography After Phacoemulsification With or Without Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.原发性闭角型青光眼患者白内障超声乳化吸除术联合或不联合房角粘连分离术后前房角的眼前节光学相干断层扫描评估
J Glaucoma. 2015 Dec;24(9):647-55. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000061.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Different Types of Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Surgeries in Patients with Primary Angle Closure (PAC) or PAC Glaucoma: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.不同类型的降眼压手术治疗原发性房角关闭(PAC)或 PAC 相关青光眼患者的疗效和安全性:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;39(1):17-26. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2223292. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and Complications of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries (MIGS) in Primary Angle Closure and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼行微创青光眼手术(MIGS)的疗效与并发症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 11;19:483-506. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S505856. eCollection 2025.
2
One-year outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and viscogoniosynechialysis with and without endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in primary angle-closure glaucoma.原发性闭角型青光眼行超声乳化白内障吸除联合房角粘连松解术联合与不联合经结膜Nd:YAG 激光睫状体光凝术的 1 年疗效观察。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Sep;43(9):3227-3236. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02723-0. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Aqueous outflow facility after phacoemulsification with or without goniosynechialysis in primary angle closure: a randomised controlled study.原发性闭角型青光眼行超声乳化白内障吸除术联合或不联合房角粘连分离术后的房水流出功能:一项随机对照研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;101(7):879-885. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309556. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
2
Refractive outcome of combined phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation.白内障超声乳化吸除联合内镜睫状体光凝术的屈光结果
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(6):1311-1317. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0411-4. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
3
Trabeculectomy and Combined Phacoemulsification-Trabeculectomy: Outcomes and Risk Factors for Failure in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.
Outcomes of chronic angle-closure glaucoma treated by phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with or without endoscopically goniosynechialysis.
采用超声乳化白内障吸除术联合睫状体光凝术(伴或不伴内镜下房角粘连分离术)治疗慢性闭角型青光眼的疗效
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;15(8):1273-1278. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.08.08. eCollection 2022.
4
Comment on: Intraocular endoscopy: A review.关于《眼内内窥镜检查:综述》的评论
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;69(6):1638-1639. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_57_21.
5
Modified phacoemulsification plus goniosynechialysis compared with conventional surgery for cataract and glaucoma.改良超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角粘连分离术与传统手术治疗白内障合并青光眼的比较
Exp Ther Med. 2020 Jan;19(1):131-136. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.8182. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
6
Current management options in primary angle closure disease.原发性闭角型青光眼的当前治疗选择。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;67(3):321-323. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1932_18.
小梁切除术及白内障超声乳化吸除联合小梁切除术:原发性闭角型青光眼的手术效果及失败危险因素
J Glaucoma. 2016 Sep;25(9):763-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000493.
4
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: current status and future prospects.微创青光眼手术:现状与未来展望。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan 28;10:189-206. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S80490. eCollection 2016.
5
Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation and Pars Plana Ablation (ECP-plus) to Treat Refractory Glaucoma.内镜睫状体光凝术联合玻璃体切除术(ECP-plus)治疗难治性青光眼。
J Glaucoma. 2016 Mar;25(3):e117-22. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000278.
6
Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the treatment of mild to moderate glaucoma.联合内镜睫状体光凝术与超声乳化术对比单纯超声乳化术治疗轻至中度青光眼
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;43(6):531-9. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12510. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
7
Combining phacoemulsification with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation to manage cataract and glaucoma.联合超声乳化术与内视镜睫状体光凝术治疗白内障合并青光眼。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;41(6):546-51. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12051. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
'Phaco-ECP': combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and cataract surgery to augment medical control of glaucoma.“超声乳化-内镜睫状体光凝术”:内镜睫状体光凝术与白内障手术相结合,以增强青光眼的药物控制。
BMJ Open. 2012 May 30;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000578. Print 2012.
9
Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up.五年随访后的 Tube Versus Trabeculectomy(TVT)研究中的治疗结果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):789-803.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
10
Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up.术后五年随访中 Tube Versus Trabeculectomy(TVT)研究中的并发症。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 May;153(5):804-814.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024. Epub 2012 Jan 14.