• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗菌缝线与普通缝线预防整形手术部位感染的比较:一项双盲对照试验。

Comparison between antimicrobial-coated sutures and uncoated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infections in plastic surgery: a double blind control trial.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Plastic Surgery "P. Valdoni", Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Feb;23(3):958-964. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_16982.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_201902_16982
PMID:30779061
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical site infection (SSI) produces considerable morbidity and increases health care costs. One of its causes is microbial adherence to the surgical sutures surface. A strategy to avoid microbial colonization is the use of antimicrobial-impregnated sutures. Recently absorbable sutures treated with chlorhexidine (CHX) have been developed. Our study purpose was to compare CHX-coated and uncoated suture in elective plastic surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, single-centre controlled trial of 18 patients undergoing elective bilateral mammary surgery and 18 patients undergoing skin lesions removals. Patients were divided into 2 groups receiving antibacterial-coated (study group) and uncoated (controlled group) sutures for wound closure. Patients were evaluated for scar results and signs of SSIs were monitored over a period of 30 days (or 1 year in case of prosthetic surgery). Statistical comparison was performed using dependent t-tests for paired samples.

RESULTS

For patients undergoing mammary surgery, based on Vancouver Scale, there were no significant differences between the two groups. We noticed that in 8 patients the vertical scars belonging to the control group were larger than the contralateral 8 vertical sutures belonging to the study group. For patients undergoing skin surgery, surgical wounds treated with uncoated sutures were significantly more erythematous than the ones belonging to the study group (Media: 0,8333% vs. 1,5556%, respectively; standard deviation: 9,235 vs. 0,6157; 95%; p=0.0092).

CONCLUSIONS

No wounds infection was reported between the two groups. Based on our experience, we conclude that the use of CHX-coated sutures should be considered in case of inflamed lesions removal. Further studies are needed to validate our results.

摘要

目的

手术部位感染(SSI)会导致相当大的发病率,并增加医疗保健成本。其原因之一是微生物附着在手术缝线表面。避免微生物定植的策略是使用抗菌缝线。最近开发了用洗必泰(CHX)处理的可吸收缝线。我们的研究目的是比较择期整形手术中 CHX 涂层缝线和未涂层缝线。

患者和方法

我们进行了一项随机、双盲、单中心对照试验,纳入 18 例行双侧乳房手术的患者和 18 例行皮肤病变切除术的患者。患者分为接受抗菌涂层(研究组)和未涂层(对照组)缝线缝合伤口的两组。对患者进行疤痕结果评估,并在 30 天(或假体手术 1 年)期间监测 SSI 迹象。使用配对样本的依赖 t 检验进行统计比较。

结果

对于接受乳房手术的患者,根据温哥华量表,两组之间没有显著差异。我们注意到,在 8 例患者中,对照组的垂直疤痕比研究组的对侧 8 条垂直缝线大。对于接受皮肤手术的患者,未涂层缝线处理的手术伤口明显比研究组的手术伤口更红肿(中位数:0.8333%比 1.5556%;标准差:9.235 比 0.6157;95%;p=0.0092)。

结论

两组均未报告伤口感染。根据我们的经验,我们得出结论,在炎症性病变切除时应考虑使用 CHX 涂层缝线。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的结果。

相似文献

1
Comparison between antimicrobial-coated sutures and uncoated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infections in plastic surgery: a double blind control trial.抗菌缝线与普通缝线预防整形手术部位感染的比较:一项双盲对照试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Feb;23(3):958-964. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201902_16982.
2
Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. uncoated sutures (PDS II): a randomized multicenter study.腹部闭合术后使用三氯生涂层可吸收缝线(PDS Plus)与未涂层缝线(PDS II)治疗结直肠手术部位感染的随机多中心研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Dec;12(6):483-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.001. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
3
Effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical site infection: a review of the literature.抗菌涂层缝线预防手术部位感染的有效性:文献综述。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Sep;22(17):5729-5739. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201809_15841.
4
The effect of triclosan-coated sutures on the rate of surgical site infection after hip and knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial of 2546 patients.三氯生涂层缝线对髋关节和膝关节置换术后手术部位感染率的影响:一项针对2546例患者的双盲随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):296-302. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B3.BJJ-2017-0247.R1.
5
Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.三氯生涂层缝线可降低结直肠手术后伤口感染的发生率和成本:一项随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2013 Apr;153(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
Comparison of bacterial colonization on absorbable non-coated suture with Triclosan- or Chlorhexidine-coated sutures: a randomized controlled study.含三氯生或洗必泰涂层缝线与可吸收非涂层缝线的细菌定植比较:一项随机对照研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Sep;27(18):8371-8383. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202309_33760.
7
A randomized 'N-of-1' single blinded clinical trial of barbed dermal sutures vs. smooth sutures in elective plastic surgery shows differences in scar appearance two-years post-operatively.一项在择期整形手术中比较倒刺真皮缝线与光滑缝线的随机“单病例”单盲临床试验显示,术后两年瘢痕外观存在差异。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015 Jul;68(7):1003-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.03.015. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
8
Do antibacterial skin sutures reduce surgical site infections after elective open abdominal surgery? - Study protocol of a prospective, randomized controlled single center trial.抗菌皮肤缝线是否能降低择期开腹手术后手术部位感染?——一项前瞻性、随机对照、单中心试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3492-3.
9
Viable adhered Staphylococcus aureus highly reduced on novel antimicrobial sutures using chlorhexidine and octenidine to avoid surgical site infection (SSI).使用洗必泰和奥替尼啶的新型抗菌缝线可使存活的黏附金黄色葡萄球菌大量减少,从而避免手术部位感染(SSI)。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190912. eCollection 2018.
10
Triclosan-coated abdominal closure sutures reduce the incidence of surgical site infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy.涂有三氯生的腹部闭合缝线可降低胰十二指肠切除术后手术部位感染的发生率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):305-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2012.170. Epub 2014 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Silver-Treated Sutures for the Prevention of Biofilm-Associated Surgical Site Infections.用于预防生物膜相关手术部位感染的银处理缝线
Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;14(1):49. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010049.
2
Optimizing Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Dermatologic Surgery.优化皮肤科手术中手术部位感染的预防
J Cutan Med Surg. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):167-178. doi: 10.1177/12034754241303086. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
Fabrication of a Biocompatible Nanoantimicrobial Suture for Rapid Wound Healing after Surgery.用于术后快速伤口愈合的生物相容性纳米抗菌缝线的制备
ACS Omega. 2024 May 13;9(21):22573-22580. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09484. eCollection 2024 May 28.