Suppr超能文献

公众对院外心脏骤停中女性接受旁观者心肺复苏术少于男性的原因的看法。

Public Perceptions on Why Women Receive Less Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Than Men in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine (S.M.P., S.K.S.), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

Center for Women's Health Research (S.M.P., C.K., S.L.D.), Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.

出版信息

Circulation. 2019 Feb 19;139(8):1060-1068. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037692.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) less often than men. Understanding public perceptions of why this occurs is a necessary first step toward equitable application of this potentially life-saving intervention.

METHODS

We conducted a national survey of members of the public using Mechanical Turk, Amazon's crowdsourcing platform, to determine reasons why women might receive bystander CPR less often than men. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) located in the United States. Responses were excluded if the participant was not able to define CPR correctly. Participants were asked to answer the following free-text question: "Do you have any ideas on why women may be less likely to receive CPR than men when they collapse in public?" Descriptive statistics were used to define the cohort. The free-text response was coded using open coding, and major themes were identified via classical content analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 548 subjects were surveyed. Mean age was 38.8 years, and 49.8% were female. Participants were geographically distributed as follows: 18.5% West, 9.2% Southwest, 22.0% Midwest, 27.5% Southeast, and 22.9% Northeast. After analysis, 3 major themes were detected for why the public perceives that women receive less bystander CPR. They include the following: (1) sexualization of women's bodies; (2) women are weak and frail and therefore prone to injury; and (3) misperceptions about women in acute medical distress. Overall, 41.9% (227) were trained in CPR while 4.4% reported having provided CPR in a medical emergency.

CONCLUSIONS

Members of the general public perceive fears about inappropriate touching, accusations of sexual assault, and fear of causing injury as inhibiting bystander CPR for women. Educational and policy efforts to address these perceptions may reduce the sex differences in the application of bystander CPR.

摘要

背景

在院外发生心脏骤停的女性接受旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)的频率低于男性。了解公众对这种情况发生的看法是公平应用这种潜在救命干预措施的必要第一步。

方法

我们使用亚马逊众包平台 Mechanical Turk 对公众进行了一项全国性调查,以确定女性接受旁观者 CPR 的频率可能低于男性的原因。合格的参与者为 18 岁以上的美国成年人。如果参与者无法正确定义 CPR,则排除其响应。参与者被要求回答以下自由文本问题:“您对为什么女性在公共场所昏倒时可能比男性更不容易接受 CPR 有什么想法?” 使用描述性统计来定义队列。通过开放式编码对自由文本响应进行编码,并通过经典内容分析确定主要主题。

结果

共有 548 名受试者接受了调查。平均年龄为 38.8 岁,其中 49.8%为女性。参与者的地理位置分布如下:18.5%来自西部,9.2%来自西南部,22.0%来自中西部,27.5%来自东南部,22.9%来自东北部。分析后,发现公众认为女性接受旁观者 CPR 较少的原因有 3 个主要主题。它们包括以下几点:(1)女性身体的色情化;(2)女性身体虚弱,因此容易受伤;(3)对急性医疗困境中的女性的误解。总的来说,41.9%(227 人)接受过 CPR 培训,而 4.4%的人报告在医疗紧急情况下提供过 CPR。

结论

普通公众认为担心不当触摸,性侵犯指控和担心造成伤害会阻止旁观者对女性进行 CPR。解决这些看法的教育和政策努力可能会减少旁观者 CPR 应用中的性别差异。

相似文献

2
Examining the Impact of Layperson Rescuer Gender on the Receipt of Bystander CPR for Women in Cardiac Arrest.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Apr;17(4):e010249. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010249. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Public perception towards bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Emerg Med J. 2019 Nov;36(11):660-665. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208234. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Disparities in the United States.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 17;6(5):e006124. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006124.
7
Comorbidity and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Heart. 2020 Jul;106(14):1087-1093. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315954. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Attitudes to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Defibrillator Use: A Survey of UK Adults in 2017.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 2;8(7):e008267. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008267.

引用本文的文献

1
2
Association between bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and patient's sex: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 28;22:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100916. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Removal of bra for pad placement and defibrillation - A scoping review.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Feb 3;22:100885. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100885. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Teaching Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Medicine Is Not Just a Matter of Content.
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Dec 5;11:23821205241304531. doi: 10.1177/23821205241304531. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
CPR training as a gender and rights-based healthcare issue.
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae156.
9
Management of Patients With Cardiac Arrest Requiring Interfacility Transport: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):e316-e327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001282. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
10
Global Sex Disparities in Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scoping Review.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e035794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035794. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender Disparities Among Adult Recipients of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Public.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Aug;11(8):e004710. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004710.
2
Gender and age-specific aspects of awareness and knowledge in basic life support.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 12;13(6):e0198918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198918. eCollection 2018.
3
Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):533-538. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
4
Perceptions of firearms and suicide: The role of misinformation in storage practices and openness to means safety measures.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:530-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.057. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
5
Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry.
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1566-9. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
7
Measuring the Prevalence of Problematic Respondent Behaviors among MTurk, Campus, and Community Participants.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0157732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157732. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验