Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):e241-e249. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003620.
Less than half of the thousands of children who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrests annually survive, and neurologic injury is common among survivors. Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves short-term survival, but its impact on longer term survival and mitochondrial respiration-a potential neurotherapeutic target-remains unknown. The primary objectives of this study were to compare rates of 24-hour survival with favorable neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest treated with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus standard depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to compare brain and heart mitochondrial respiration between groups 24 hours after resuscitation.
Randomized preclinical large animal trial.
A large animal resuscitation laboratory at a large academic children's hospital.
Twenty-eight 4-week-old female piglets (8-11 kg).
Twenty-two swine underwent 7 minutes of asphyxia followed by ventricular fibrillation and randomized treatment with either hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 10; compression depth titrated to aortic systolic pressure of 90 mm Hg, vasopressors titrated to coronary perfusion pressure ≥ 20 mm Hg) or depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 12; depth 1/3 chest diameter, epinephrine every 4 min). Six animals (sham group) underwent anesthesia and instrumentation without cardiac arrest. The primary outcomes were favorable neurologic outcome (swine Cerebral Performance Category ≤ 2) and mitochondrial maximal oxidative phosphorylation utilizing substrate for complex I and complex II (OXPHOSCI+CII) in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.
Favorable neurologic outcome was more likely with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (7/10) than depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1/12; p = 0.006). Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher intra-arrest coronary perfusion pressure, aortic pressures, and brain tissue oxygenation. Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher OXPHOSCI+CII (pmol oxygen/s × mg/citrate synthase) in the cortex (6.00 ± 0.28 vs 3.88 ± 0.43; p < 0.05) and hippocampus (6.26 ± 0.67 vs 3.55 ± 0.65; p < 0.05) and higher complex I respiration (pmol oxygen/s × mg) in the right (20.62 ± 1.06 vs 15.88 ± 0.81; p < 0.05) and left ventricles (20.14 ± 1.40 vs 14.17 ± 1.53; p < 0.05).
In a model of asphyxia-associated pediatric cardiac arrest, hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases rates of 24-hour survival with favorable neurologic outcome, intra-arrest hemodynamics, and cerebral and myocardial mitochondrial respiration.
每年有数千名在院内心搏骤停的儿童,其中不到一半的儿童存活下来,幸存者中常见神经损伤。血流动力学导向心肺复苏可提高短期存活率,但对长期存活率和线粒体呼吸(潜在的神经治疗靶点)的影响仍不清楚。本研究的主要目的是比较血流动力学导向心肺复苏与标准深度导向心肺复苏治疗后心脏骤停 24 小时的存活率和良好神经结局,并比较复苏后 24 小时脑和心脏线粒体呼吸。
随机的临床前大型动物试验。
大型学术儿童医院的大型动物复苏实验室。
28 只 4 周龄雌性小猪(8-11kg)。
22 只猪经历 7 分钟的窒息,随后发生心室颤动,并随机接受血流动力学导向心肺复苏(n = 10;主动脉收缩压滴定至 90mmHg,加压素滴定至冠状动脉灌注压≥20mmHg)或深度导向心肺复苏(n = 12;深度 1/3 胸径,每 4min 给予肾上腺素)。6 只动物(假手术组)接受麻醉和仪器操作但不进行心脏骤停。主要结局是良好的神经结局(猪脑功能分类≤2)和大脑皮质和海马的线粒体最大氧化磷酸化利用 I 复合物和 II 复合物的底物(OXPHOSCI+CII)。
血流动力学导向心肺复苏的神经结局良好(7/10)的可能性高于深度导向心肺复苏(1/12;p = 0.006)。血流动力学导向心肺复苏导致更高的心脏骤停期间冠状动脉灌注压、主动脉压和脑组织氧合。血流动力学导向心肺复苏导致大脑皮质(6.00±0.28 比 3.88±0.43;p<0.05)和海马(6.26±0.67 比 3.55±0.65;p<0.05)以及右心室(20.62±1.06 比 15.88±0.81;p<0.05)和左心室(20.14±1.40 比 14.17±1.53;p<0.05)的 OXPHOSCI+CII 更高(每毫克柠檬酸合酶的氧消耗/秒),和更高的 I 复合物呼吸(每毫克的氧消耗/秒)。
在窒息相关儿科心脏骤停模型中,血流动力学导向心肺复苏可提高 24 小时生存率、心脏骤停期间的血流动力学、脑和心肌线粒体呼吸,以及良好的神经结局。