Suppr超能文献

模拟口对口通气和胸外按压(旁观者心肺复苏)可改善院前小儿窒息性心脏骤停猪模型的预后。

Simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions (bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves outcome in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest.

作者信息

Berg R A, Hilwig R W, Kern K B, Babar I, Ewy G A

机构信息

University of Arizona Heart Center, Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1893-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199909000-00030.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of four methods of simulated single-rescuer bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in a clinically relevant swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine anesthetized domestic piglets.

INTERVENTIONS

Asphyxial cardiac arrest was produced by clamping the endotracheal tubes of the piglets. For 8 mins of simulated bystander CPR, animals were randomly assigned to the following groups: group 1, chest compressions and simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation (FI(O2) = 0.17, FI(CO2) = 0.04) (CC+V); group 2, chest compressions only (CC); group 3, simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation only (V); and group 4, no CPR (control group). Standard advanced life support was then provided, simulating paramedic arrival. Animals that were successfully resuscitated received 1 hr of intensive care support and were observed for 24 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Electrocardiogram, aortic blood pressure, right atrial blood pressure, and end-tidal CO2 were monitored continuously until the intensive care period ended. Arterial and mixed venous blood gases were measured at baseline, 1 min after cardiac arrest, and 7 mins after cardiac arrest. Minute ventilation was determined during each minute of bystander CPR. Survival and neurologic outcome were determined. Twenty-four-hour survival was attained in eight of 10 group 1 (CC+V) piglets vs. three of 14 group 2 (CC) piglets (p < or = .01), one of seven group 3 (V) piglets (p < or = .05), and two of eight group 4 (control) piglets (p < or = .05). Twenty-four-hour neurologically normal survival occurred in seven of 10 group 1 (CC+V) piglets vs. one of 14 group 2 (CC) piglets (p < or = .01), one of seven group 3 (V) piglets (p < or = .05), and none of eight group 4 (control) piglets (p < or = .01). Arterial oxygenation and pH were markedly better during CPR in group 1 than in group 2. Within 5 mins of bystander CPR, six of 10 group 1 (CC+V) piglets attained sustained return of spontaneous circulation vs. only two of 14 group 2 (CC) piglets and none of the piglets in the other two groups (p < or = .05 for all groups).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pediatric asphyxial model of prehospital single-rescuer bystander CPR, chest compressions plus simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation improved systemic oxygenation, coronary perfusion pressures, early return of spontaneous circulation, and 24-hr survival compared with the other three approaches.

摘要

目的

在临床相关的院前小儿窒息性心脏骤停猪模型中比较四种模拟单施救者旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)方法的疗效。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

研究对象

39只麻醉后的家猪幼崽。

干预措施

通过夹住猪幼崽的气管导管造成窒息性心脏骤停。在8分钟的模拟旁观者CPR期间,动物被随机分为以下几组:第1组,胸外按压加模拟口对口通气(Fi(O₂)=0.17,Fi(CO₂)=0.04)(CC+V);第2组,仅胸外按压(CC);第3组,仅模拟口对口通气(V);第4组,不进行CPR(对照组)。随后提供标准的高级生命支持,模拟护理人员到达。成功复苏的动物接受1小时的重症监护支持,并观察24小时。

测量指标和主要结果

持续监测心电图、主动脉血压、右心房血压和呼气末二氧化碳,直至重症监护期结束。在基线、心脏骤停后1分钟和心脏骤停后7分钟测量动脉血和混合静脉血气。在旁观者CPR的每分钟确定分钟通气量。确定生存情况和神经学结果。第1组(CC+V)的10只猪幼崽中有8只存活24小时,而第2组(CC)的14只猪幼崽中有3只存活(p≤0.01),第3组(V)的7只猪幼崽中有1只存活(p≤0.05),第4组(对照组)的8只猪幼崽中有2只存活(p≤0.05)。第1组(CC+V)的10只猪幼崽中有7只在24小时神经功能正常存活,而第2组(CC)的14只猪幼崽中有1只存活(p≤0.01),第3组(V)的7只猪幼崽中有1只存活(p≤0.05),第4组(对照组)的8只猪幼崽均未存活(p≤0.01)。第1组CPR期间的动脉氧合和pH值明显优于第2组。在旁观者CPR的5分钟内,第1组(CC+V)的10只猪幼崽中有6只实现了自主循环的持续恢复,而第2组(CC)的14只猪幼崽中只有2只实现了自主循环的持续恢复,其他两组的猪幼崽均未实现(所有组p≤0.05)。

结论

在这个院前单施救者旁观者CPR的小儿窒息模型中,与其他三种方法相比,胸外按压加模拟口对口通气改善了全身氧合、冠状动脉灌注压、自主循环的早期恢复和24小时生存率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验