• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于体重的指南高估了极早产儿的气管导管尖端位置。

Weight-Based Guide Overestimates Endotracheal Tube Tip Position in Extremely Preterm Infants.

机构信息

Neonatal Unit, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2019 Dec;36(14):1498-1503. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678531. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1678531
PMID:30780185
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between endotracheal tube (ETT) tip position and adverse pulmonary outcomes using chest X-ray (CXR) in extremely preterm infants in whom ETT insertion length was estimated using weight + 6 guide (adding 6 cms to the infant's weight in kg).

STUDY DESIGN

CXRs of 85 infants performed in the first week were reviewed for right-sided atelectasis, air leaks, and uneven lung inflation. The first CXR was later reviewed to document the ETT tip. Regression analysis was performed to find the association between ETT tip position and adverse outcome after adjusting for other confounders.

RESULTS

Forty (46%) infants had ETT tip placement between the first and second thoracic vertebrae (optimal position) compared with 45 (53%) who had the ETT tip placement outside this range (suboptimal position). Infants with suboptimal ETT were ventilated for a longer period (6.1 vs. 15.9 days;  = 0.004). The odds of adverse outcomes was 11.6 (95% confidence interval: 3.03, 44.1) times higher among infants who did not have ETT at the optimal position compared with infants who had ETT at the optimal position.

CONCLUSION

Weight + 6 guide is not recommended to estimate ETT insertion length in extremely preterm infants. Gestation-based guide may be more appropriate to estimate ETT insertion length in this group of infants.

摘要

目的

通过胸部 X 光(CXR)评估使用体重+6 引导(在婴儿体重的公斤数上加 6 厘米)估计气管插管(ETT)插入长度的极早产儿中 ETT 尖端位置与不良肺部结局之间的关系。

研究设计

对 85 名婴儿在第一周进行的 CXR 进行了右侧肺不张、气胸和不均匀肺充气的评估。然后对第一张 CXR 进行复查,以记录 ETT 尖端位置。回归分析用于在调整其他混杂因素后,发现 ETT 尖端位置与不良结局之间的关联。

结果

40 名(46%)婴儿的 ETT 尖端位置在第一和第二胸椎之间(最佳位置),而 45 名(53%)婴儿的 ETT 尖端位置超出此范围(次优位置)。ETT 尖端位置不佳的婴儿通气时间更长(6.1 天 vs. 15.9 天;=0.004)。与 ETT 尖端位于最佳位置的婴儿相比,未处于最佳位置的婴儿不良结局的可能性高 11.6 倍(95%置信区间:3.03,44.1)。

结论

不建议使用体重+6 引导来估计极早产儿的 ETT 插入长度。基于胎龄的引导可能更适合估计这组婴儿的 ETT 插入长度。

相似文献

1
Weight-Based Guide Overestimates Endotracheal Tube Tip Position in Extremely Preterm Infants.基于体重的指南高估了极早产儿的气管导管尖端位置。
Am J Perinatol. 2019 Dec;36(14):1498-1503. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678531. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
Optimal endotracheal tube tip position in extremely premature infants.极早早产儿气管插管尖端的最佳位置
Am J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;25(1):13-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995221. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
3
Determination of optimal endotracheal tube tip depth from the gum in neonates by X-ray and ultrasound.X 射线和超声联合测定新生儿口腔内气管导管尖端位置。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(12):2075-2080. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1538350. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
4
Randomised trial of estimating oral endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using weight or vocal cord guide.使用体重或声带引导估计新生儿经口气管插管插入深度的随机试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Jul;103(4):F312-F316. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312798. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Randomised trial of estimating oral endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using suprasternal palpation of the tip or weight.使用胸骨上切迹触诊尖端或重量估计新生儿经口气管插管插入深度的随机试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 Mar;105(2):196-200. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317328. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
Methods for Estimating Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.估计新生儿气管内插管深度的方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Jul;38(9):901-908. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402747. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Ultrasound confirmation of endotracheal tube position in neonates.超声确认新生儿气管内导管位置。
Neonatology. 2012;102(3):185-9. doi: 10.1159/000338585. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
8
Estimating the endotracheal tube insertion depth in newborns using weight or gestation: a randomised trial.使用体重或孕周估计新生儿气管插管深度:一项随机试验。
Neonatology. 2015;107(3):167-72. doi: 10.1159/000369375.
9
Evaluating Endotracheal Tube Depth in Infants Weighing Less Than 1 Kilogram.评估体重小于 1 千克的婴儿的气管插管深度。
Respir Care. 2019 Mar;64(3):243-247. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06202. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
Ultrasound for Endotracheal Tube Tip Position in Term and Preterm Infants.超声用于确定足月和早产儿气管导管尖端位置。
Neonatology. 2021;118(5):569-577. doi: 10.1159/000518278. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized endotracheal tube and intravascular access placement in infants born at 22-23 weeks gestation.对妊娠22-23周出生的婴儿进行标准化气管插管和血管通路置入。
Pediatr Res. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04186-8.
2
The Effect of Endotracheal Tube (ETT) Tip Position on Lung Aeration in Term and Preterm Neonates: A Comparative Analysis.气管内导管(ETT)尖端位置对足月儿和早产儿肺通气的影响:一项对比分析。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 23;17(2):e79529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79529. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
It's the little things. A framework and guidance for programs to care for infants 22-23 weeks' gestational age.
正是这些小事。为照顾孕龄22 - 23周婴儿的项目提供的一个框架和指导。
J Perinatol. 2025 Mar 10. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02252-x.
4
Recognizing clinical features of primary ciliary dyskinesia in the perinatal period.识别围生期原发性纤毛运动障碍的临床特征。
J Perinatol. 2024 Nov;44(11):1700-1706. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02068-1. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines.新生儿和婴儿的气道管理:欧洲麻醉学会和重症监护学会与英国麻醉学会联合指南。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Jan 1;41(1):3-23. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001928. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
An Immature Science: Intensive Care for Infants Born at ≤23 Weeks of Gestation.一门尚不成熟的科学:对妊娠≤23周出生婴儿的重症监护
J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;233:16-25.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 7.