Taylor David McD, Kant Joyce A, Dombagolla Mahesha Hk, Lai Fiona Wy, Hendarto Andreas
Emergency Medicine Research, Emergency Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Apr;31(2):283-286. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13258. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
Little is known about the effects of the 'cold calling' technique (telephone contact without prior warning) for patient follow up in ED research. Recently, we undertook a prospective, observational pain management study. Patients were cold called 48 h post-discharge and surveyed regarding their pain management satisfaction. We made contact with 778 patients. Among these, we observed 12 cases of patient anger: mistaken identity, disbelief that the hospital was calling, frustration that test results and appointment times could not be provided, abuse about ED management and outpourings of sadness. We also observed eight cases of an undesirable experience for either the patient, their family or the caller: five patients had died (including one 'at her last moments'), precipitation of patient distress and uncomfortable situations for the caller. Given our experience, we believe that cold calling should be avoided, where possible, and other techniques (e.g. limited disclosure) considered as alternatives.
关于“冷呼叫”技术(无事先警告的电话联系)在急诊研究中用于患者随访的效果,人们了解甚少。最近,我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性疼痛管理研究。患者在出院后48小时被冷呼叫,并就其对疼痛管理的满意度进行调查。我们联系了778名患者。在这些患者中,我们观察到12例患者愤怒的情况:身份错误、不相信医院会打电话、因无法提供检查结果和预约时间而感到沮丧、对急诊管理的辱骂以及悲伤情绪的倾诉。我们还观察到8例对患者、其家人或打电话者来说是不良经历的情况:5名患者已经死亡(包括一名“在弥留之际”的患者)、患者痛苦情绪的引发以及打电话者面临的不舒服情况。鉴于我们的经验,我们认为应尽可能避免冷呼叫,并考虑采用其他技术(如有限披露)作为替代方法。