Carson M L
USDA-ARS, Cereal Disease Laboratory, St. Paul, MN 55108 formerly USDA-ARS, Plant Science Research, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Plant Dis. 2006 Jul;90(7):910-914. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0910.
A synthetic population of maize (Zea mays) was created from five inbred lines of varying levels of partial resistance to northern leaf blight (NLB). This synthetic was subjected to three cycles of recurrent phenotypic selection with pollen control for either increased latent period or decreased lesion length. A selection intensity of ca. 10% was used in each selection cycle. The original synthetic and three advanced selection cycles for each of the two components of partial resistance were evaluated in field trials in the summers of 1999 and 2001, and in greenhouse trials. Selection for increased latent period was more effective in improving resistance to NLB (20 to 27% gain/cycle) (as measured by area under the disease progress curve [AUDPC]) than was selection for decreased lesion length (14 to 18% gain/cycle). Responses in AUDPC to selection for either component of resistance were linear in the 1999 field trial, but were quadratic (decreased response in advanced cycles) in the 2001 trial. Selection for increased latent period in the field resulted in a 0.6-day increase in latent period per selection cycle when measured in the greenhouse and a 2-day increase per selection cycle when measured in the field. Selection for decreased lesion length in the field did not significantly alter latent period in the greenhouse. These results support using selection for increased latent period as an effective means of improving partial resistance to NLB in maize populations. Decreased lesion length was more difficult to measure and selection based on this criterion was less effective in improving partial resistance.
从五个对玉米大斑病(NLB)具有不同水平部分抗性的自交系中创建了一个玉米(Zea mays)合成群体。该合成群体进行了三轮轮回表型选择,并通过花粉控制来增加潜伏期或缩短病斑长度。每个选择周期的选择强度约为10%。在1999年和2001年夏季的田间试验以及温室试验中,对原始合成群体以及部分抗性的两个组成部分各自的三个高级选择周期进行了评估。选择增加潜伏期在提高对NLB的抗性方面(以病害进展曲线下面积[AUDPC]衡量,每个周期增益20%至27%)比选择缩短病斑长度(每个周期增益14%至18%)更有效。在1999年田间试验中,AUDPC对任何一个抗性组成部分的选择响应都是线性的,但在2001年试验中是二次曲线的(在高级周期中响应降低)。在田间选择增加潜伏期,在温室中测量时每个选择周期潜伏期增加0.6天,在田间测量时每个选择周期增加2天。在田间选择缩短病斑长度并没有显著改变温室中的潜伏期。这些结果支持将选择增加潜伏期作为提高玉米群体对NLB部分抗性的有效手段。缩短病斑长度更难测量,基于此标准的选择在提高部分抗性方面效果较差。