• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考科蓝视野:介绍考科蓝眼中的考科蓝角落

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye.

机构信息

International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2019 Jun;33(6):882-886. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0357-7. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1038/s41433-019-0357-7
PMID:30783261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707294/
Abstract

In 1972, Archie Cochrane wrote "It is surely a great criticism of our profession that we have not organised a critical summary, by specialty or subspecialty, adapted periodically, of all relevant randomised controlled trials". The Cochrane Collaboration arose in response to Archie Cochrane's challenge. Cochrane Eyes and Vision aims to prepare and promote access to systematic reviews of interventions for preventing or treating eye conditions and/or visual impairment, and helping people adjust to visual impairment or blindness. To identify all relevant randomised controlled trials, Cochrane Eyes and Vision has a team of information specialists who develop search strategies to identify studies for inclusion in Cochrane reviews. Since 1997 we have published 266 protocols, 193 new reviews and 158 updated reviews. The majority of these are reviews of intervention effectiveness; three reviews are diagnostic test accuracy reviews. Overall 18% of reviews contain no trials, highlighting a potential evidence gap. We provide training, education and guidance to systematic review authors and work with clinical and patient partners to prioritise and disseminate reviews. In addition, Cochrane Eyes and Vision US satellite carries out critical methodologic research addressing topics relevant to producing high-quality reviews. We are partnering with the journal Eye to publish commentaries on selected Cochrane systematic review findings. This partnership will allow us to make high-quality evidence available to ophthalmologists and other practitioners, researchers, policy makers and patients.

摘要

1972 年,阿奇· Cochrane 写道:“我们的专业人士没有组织起来,按专业或亚专业,定期对所有相关的随机对照试验进行批判性总结,这无疑是对我们专业的一大批评。” Cochrane 协作组织就是为了回应阿奇· Cochrane 的挑战而成立的。Cochrane 眼与视觉旨在编写和促进获取预防或治疗眼部疾病和/或视力障碍的干预措施的系统评价,并帮助人们适应视力障碍或失明。为了确定所有相关的随机对照试验,Cochrane 眼与视觉有一个信息专家团队,他们制定搜索策略来确定纳入 Cochrane 综述的研究。自 1997 年以来,我们已经发表了 266 份方案,193 份新的综述和 158 份更新的综述。其中大多数是干预效果的综述;有 3 篇是诊断测试准确性的综述。总体而言,18%的综述没有试验,这突出了潜在的证据差距。我们为系统评价作者提供培训、教育和指导,并与临床和患者合作伙伴合作,优先考虑和传播评价。此外,Cochrane 眼与视觉美国卫星开展了关键的方法学研究,以解决与制作高质量评价相关的主题。我们正在与 Eye 杂志合作,发表关于选定的 Cochrane 系统评价结果的评论。这种伙伴关系将使我们能够为眼科医生和其他从业者、研究人员、政策制定者和患者提供高质量的证据。

相似文献

1
Cochrane Eyes and Vision: a perspective introducing Cochrane Corner in Eye.考科蓝视野:介绍考科蓝眼中的考科蓝角落
Eye (Lond). 2019 Jun;33(6):882-886. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0357-7. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
2
The Cochrane collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care.考克兰协作网:编制、维护并传播关于卫生保健效果的系统评价。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:156-63; discussion 163-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x.
3
The Cochrane Skin Group. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of clinical interventions in dermatology.考克兰皮肤小组。编写、维护和传播皮肤病学临床干预措施的系统评价。
Arch Dermatol. 1998 Dec;134(12):1620-6. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.12.1620.
4
A Review of Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions Relevant to Orthoptic Practice.与斜视矫正实践相关干预措施的Cochrane系统评价综述
Strabismus. 2017 Sep;25(3):101-111. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2017.1305424. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
5
Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.识别和描述 2016 年美国眼科学会成人白内障首选实践指南的可靠证据。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):514-523. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0786.
6
Reliability of the Evidence Addressing Treatment of Corneal Diseases: A Summary of Systematic Reviews.评估角膜疾病治疗方法的证据的可靠性:系统评价综述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):775-785. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1063.
7
The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.《Cochrane系统评价数据库》的起源、发展及未来
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:182-95. doi: 10.1017/S026646230909062X. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool.大多数 Cochrane 系统评价和方案并未遵循 Cochrane 的偏倚风险 2.0 工具。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Feb 20;69(3):469-472. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221593. eCollection 2023.
10
Authorship diversity among systematic reviews in eyes and vision.眼科学和视觉系统评价的作者多样性。
Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;9(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01451-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying important questions for Cochrane systematic reviews in Eyes and Vision: Report of a priority setting exercise.确定Cochrane眼与视觉系统评价的重要问题:优先排序活动报告
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 May 24;1(3):e12014. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12014. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Inequities in glaucoma research: an analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews and randomized trials.青光眼研究中的不平等现象:对Cochrane系统评价和随机试验的分析
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May;181:111717. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111717. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
3
Efficacy and safety of manual acupuncture for the treatment of upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.针刺治疗脑卒中后上肢运动功能障碍的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 12;16(11):e0258921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258921. eCollection 2021.
4
Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-analysis.微创青光眼手术技术治疗开角型青光眼:Cochrane 系统评价和网络荟萃分析概述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;139(9):983-989. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.2351.
5
Identifying priority review questions for Cochrane Eyes and Vision: protocol for a priority setting exercise.确定 Cochrane Eyes and Vision 的优先审查问题:一项优先设定实践的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 25;11(6):e046319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046319.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Questions and Outcomes Prioritized by Patients With Dry Eye.干眼患者优先考虑的研究问题和结果。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 1;136(10):1170-1179. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3352.
2
Appraising the Quality of Systematic Reviews for Age-Related Macular Degeneration Interventions: A Systematic Review.评价年龄相关性黄斑变性干预措施的系统评价质量:一项系统评价。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 1;136(9):1051-1061. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.2620.
3
Reducing inequity of cataract blindness and vision impairment is a global priority, but where is the evidence?减少白内障致盲和视力损害的不平等是全球优先事项,但有何证据?
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;102(9):1179-1181. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-311985. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
Identification and Description of Reliable Evidence for 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines for Cataract in the Adult Eye.识别和描述 2016 年美国眼科学会成人白内障首选实践指南的可靠证据。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 May 1;136(5):514-523. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0786.
5
Gaps in Current Knowledge and Priorities for Future Research in Dry Eye.干眼当前知识的空白及未来研究的重点
Cornea. 2017 Dec;36(12):1584-1591. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001350.
6
The quality of systematic reviews about interventions for refractive error can be improved: a review of systematic reviews.关于屈光不正干预措施的系统评价质量可得到改善:系统评价综述
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 5;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0561-9.
7
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases.4种最常见眼病的临床试验与系统评价结果比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep 1;135(9):933-940. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.2583.
8
Antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplements for slowing the progression of age-related macular degeneration.抗氧化维生素和矿物质补充剂用于延缓年龄相关性黄斑变性的进展。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD000254. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000254.pub4.
9
Setting Priorities for Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research and Identifying Evidence Gaps.确定糖尿病视网膜病变临床研究的优先事项并找出证据空白。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2017 Mar-Apr;1(2):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2016.10.003.
10
Identifying reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) via a hybrid machine learning and crowdsourcing approach.通过机器学习与众包相结合的方法识别随机对照试验(RCT)报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1165-1168. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx053.