Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 25;12(4):373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.11.013.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between pre-procedural left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) patterns and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
The association between pre-procedural LVH pattern and severity and clinical outcomes after TAVR is uncertain.
Patients (n = 31,199) across 422 sites who underwent TAVR from November 2011 through June 2016 as part of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapies) Registry linked with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database were evaluated by varying LVH patterns, according to sex-specific cutoffs for left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness. The association between LVH pattern (concentric remodeling, concentric LVH, and eccentric LVH) and outcomes (rates of mortality, myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, new dialysis requirement) at 1-year follow-up were evaluated using multivariate hazard models.
There were no significant associations between concentric remodeling (death: adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93 to 1.15; MI: HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.46; stroke: HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.39; new dialysis: HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.15), concentric LVH (death: HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.15; MI: HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.52; stroke: HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.40; new dialysis: HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.52), or eccentric LVH (death: HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.10; MI: HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.63; stroke: HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.32; new dialysis: HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.70) and outcomes at 1 year compared with patients without LVH.
In a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent TAVR, pre-procedural LVH according to left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness was not associated with adverse outcomes at 1-year follow-up. TAVR is likely to benefit patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of the presence of LVH.
本研究旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前左心室肥厚(LVH)模式与临床结局之间的关系。
术前 LVH 模式与严重程度及 TAVR 后临床结局之间的关系尚不确定。
2011 年 11 月至 2016 年 6 月,422 个地点的 31199 名患者接受了 TAVR,这是胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会 TVT(经导管瓣膜治疗)注册中心与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心数据库的一部分,根据左心室质量指数和相对壁厚度的性别特异性截断值,评估了不同的 LVH 模式。使用多变量风险模型评估 LVH 模式(向心性重构、向心性 LVH 和离心性 LVH)与 1 年随访时的结局(死亡率、心肌梗死[MI]、卒中和新透析需求)之间的关系。
与无 LVH 患者相比,向心性重构(死亡:调整后的危险比[HR]:1.03;95%置信区间[CI]:0.93 至 1.15;MI:HR:1.05;95% CI:0.76 至 1.46;卒:HR:1.11;95% CI:0.89 至 1.39;新透析:HR:0.86;95% CI:0.64 至 1.15)、向心性 LVH(死亡:HR:1.04;95% CI:0.95 至 1.15;MI:HR:1.12;95% CI:0.82 至 1.52;卒:HR:1.14;95% CI:0.92 至 1.40;新透析:HR:1.17;95% CI:0.90 至 1.52)或离心性 LVH(死亡:HR:0.98;95% CI:0.87 至 1.10;MI:HR:1.07;95% CI:0.71 至 1.63;卒:HR:1.01;95% CI:0.78 至 1.32;新透析:HR:1.25;95% CI:0.92 至 1.70)与 1 年时的结局均无显著相关性。
在接受 TAVR 的当代患者队列中,根据左心室质量指数和相对壁厚度评估的术前 LVH 与 1 年随访时的不良结局无关。TAVR 可能使严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者受益,而不论 LVH 存在与否。