Endocrinology Division, University Hospital João de Barros Barreto, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil.
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2019 Jul;16(4):344-350. doi: 10.1177/1479164119829385. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
Peripheral arterial disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for vascular events. Recommendations about whether ankle-brachial index should be performed differ depending on the source; therefore, it is necessary to re-evaluate the most important risk factors associated with peripheral arterial disease and whether it is useful to perform ankle-brachial index in newly diagnosed and drug-naïve patients with diabetes, independent of age or peripheral arterial disease symptoms.
A total of 711 subjects were divided into groups: group 1, 600 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, symptomatic or not for peripheral arterial disease; group 2, 61 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients newly diagnosed and drug naïve; and group 3, 50 subjects without diabetes. Ankle-brachial index, medical records and physical examination were performed in all patients, accessing cardiovascular risk factors.
Analysing group 1 asymptomatic patient to peripheral arterial disease, we found abnormal ankle-brachial index in 49% (77/156) ⩾50 years and 42% (16/38) <50 years ( = not significant). Considering drug-naïve patients, a peripheral arterial disease prevalence of 39% (24/61) was found; among these, 48% (13/27) were <50 years and 32% (11/34) were ⩾50 years ( = not significant). A forward stepwise regression model was developed, with type 2 diabetes mellitus duration ( = 0.12) and sedentary lifestyle ( = 0.14) found as independent variable predictors of severity of peripheral arterial disease, related to ankle-brachial index.
We suggest that, in type 2 diabetes mellitus, ankle-brachial index should be measured at diagnosis. In addition, sedentary lifestyle was strongly associated with presence and severity of peripheral arterial disease.
2 型糖尿病患者的外周动脉疾病是血管事件的重要危险因素。关于是否应进行踝肱指数检查的建议因来源而异;因此,有必要重新评估与外周动脉疾病相关的最重要危险因素,以及在新诊断且未使用药物的糖尿病患者中,是否无论年龄或外周动脉疾病症状如何,踝肱指数检查都有用。
共纳入 711 例受试者,分为三组:第 1 组,600 例有或无外周动脉疾病症状的 2 型糖尿病患者;第 2 组,61 例新诊断且未使用药物的 2 型糖尿病患者;第 3 组,50 例无糖尿病的受试者。所有患者均进行踝肱指数、病历和体格检查,以评估心血管危险因素。
分析无外周动脉疾病症状的 1 组患者,我们发现,50 岁及以上患者中踝肱指数异常的比例为 49%(77/156),而<50 岁患者的比例为 42%(16/38)(差异无统计学意义)。对于未使用药物的患者,发现外周动脉疾病的患病率为 39%(24/61);其中,<50 岁患者的比例为 48%(13/27),而≥50 岁患者的比例为 32%(11/34)(差异无统计学意义)。建立了向前逐步回归模型,发现 2 型糖尿病病程( = 0.12)和久坐生活方式( = 0.14)是与踝肱指数相关的外周动脉疾病严重程度的独立预测变量。
我们建议在 2 型糖尿病患者诊断时应测量踝肱指数。此外,久坐的生活方式与外周动脉疾病的发生和严重程度密切相关。