Suppr超能文献

粘结式间隙保持器的留存率:一项系统评价

Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

S Deshpande Shantanu, D Bendgude Vikas, V Kokkali Vivian

机构信息

Postgraduate Student, Department. of Pedodontics, Dr. D.Y Patil Dental College, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Professor and HOD, Department. of Pedodontics, Dr. D.Y Patil Dental College, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):440-445. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1554. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

Abstract

AIM

This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the average survival time and the various factors which determine the longevity of bonded space maintainers.

BACKGROUND

Although a meta-analysis could not be performed from the available literature, this review emphasizes the various factors contributing to the success of bonded space maintainers and its relevance during the planning of bonded space maintainers.

REVIEW RESULTS

The study selection criteria included in-vivo randomized and non-randomized clinical trials performed which was published in English. The databases searched were Pubmed, EBSCOhost and Google scholar, wherein the articles published from 1st January 1995 to 31st December 2015 were selected in the review.

CONCLUSION

From the existing data, it can be concluded that the average survival period of bonded space maintainers is 11.2 months. However, there is a necessity for additional clinical trials with strict protocols to better the level of evidence.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

From the various articles included in the review, the longevity of bonded space maintainers was found to be comparable to the banded space maintainers. Hence, the bonded space maintainers can be a suitable alternative to the banded space maintainers in pediatric dentistry. Deshpande SS, Bendgude VD, Kokkali VV. Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(5):440-445.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估粘结式间隙保持器的平均存活时间以及决定其使用寿命的各种因素。

背景

尽管无法从现有文献中进行荟萃分析,但本评价强调了促成粘结式间隙保持器成功的各种因素及其在粘结式间隙保持器规划过程中的相关性。

评价结果

研究选择标准包括以英文发表的体内随机和非随机临床试验。检索的数据库有PubMed、EBSCOhost和谷歌学术,其中选取了1995年1月1日至2015年12月31日发表的文章纳入本评价。

结论

从现有数据可以得出结论,粘结式间隙保持器的平均存活期为11.2个月。然而,有必要进行更多采用严格方案的临床试验以提高证据水平。

临床意义

从本评价纳入的各种文章来看,发现粘结式间隙保持器的使用寿命与带环式间隙保持器相当。因此,在儿童牙科中,粘结式间隙保持器可以作为带环式间隙保持器的合适替代物。Deshpande SS、Bendgude VD、Kokkali VV。粘结式间隙保持器的存活情况:一项系统评价《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2018年;11(5):440 - 445。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f51/6379539/b714021d876b/ijcpd-11-440-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival of Bonded Space Maintainers: A Systematic Review.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 Sep-Oct;11(5):440-445. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1554. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
Banded vs Bonded Space Maintainers: Finding Better Way Out.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 May;7(2):97-104. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1245. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
4
Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry - A systematic review.
Saudi Dent J. 2019 Apr;31(2):165-172. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Digitainers-Digital Space Maintainers: A Review.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S69-S75. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2040.
8
Assessment of Periodontal Parameters Following the Use of Fixed and Removable Space Maintainers in 6-12-year Olds.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):405-409. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1606.
9
A Comparative Study of Biodegradation of Nickel and Chromium from Space Maintainers: An in vitro Study.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015 Jan-Apr;8(1):37-41. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1280. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
Technological Advancement in Space Management-Prefabricated Space Maintainers: A Case Series.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;17(2):191-197. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2762.

引用本文的文献

3
Three-Dimensional Printed Lingual Arch Space Maintainer: A Game Changer in Pediatric Dentistry.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 2;16(7):e63680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63680. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Longevity of Aesthetic Fixed Space Maintainers in the Anterior Area of the Pediatric Dental Patient.
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;10(11):1734. doi: 10.3390/children10111734.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical evaluation of a new bonded space maintainer.
J Clin Orthod. 2014 Dec;48(12):784-90.
2
Banded vs Bonded Space Maintainers: Finding Better Way Out.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 May;7(2):97-104. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1245. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
4
5
Glass fiber-reinforced composite resin as a space maintainer: a clinical study.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008;26 Suppl 3:S98-103.
7
Contemporary space maintenance for the pediatric patient.
N Y State Dent J. 2005 Mar;71(2):32-5.
9
Success of reinforced fiber material space maintainers.
J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 May-Aug;71(2):158-62.
10
Band and loop space maintainer--made easy.
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2004 Sep;22(3):134-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验