Casaña-Ruiz MDolores, Aura-Tormos Juan Ignacio, Marques-Martinez Laura, Garcia-Miralles Esther, Perez-Bermejo Marcelino
Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
SONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;13(1):32. doi: 10.3390/dj13010032.
Evaluating the effectiveness and survival rates of space maintainers is crucial for optimal pediatric dental care. The present study's goal is to evaluate the survival rate of different types of space maintainers-removable, fixed with a metal base, or fixed with a resin base-indicated for children as a consequence of premature loss of primary teeth. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA recommendations and was previously registered in PROSPERO under registration number: CRD42024534183. The search was performed in five different databases PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. This was supplemented by a manual database search. From the initial electronic search of the five databases, 72 articles were identified after removing duplicates. After reading the titles and abstracts, 46 articles were excluded, leaving a total of 26 studies. Upon reading the full texts, 15 were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria, resulting in a total of 11 articles included in the systematic review. The total number of patients treated in the studies was 479, with four observational studies and seven randomized clinical trials. Fixed space maintainers, such as band and loop (BL) or lingual arch (LA), are preferred due to their long-term stability and lower risk of loss. In contrast, removable maintainers, such as Hawley plates, are suitable temporarily but require more patient cooperation and may be less tolerated. Space maintainers help prevent the migration of adjacent teeth and the need for more invasive orthodontic treatments in the future. Additionally, they contribute to adequate masticatory function and speech development.
评估间隙保持器的有效性和存活率对于优化儿童牙科护理至关重要。本研究的目的是评估因乳牙过早脱落而推荐给儿童使用的不同类型间隙保持器(可摘式、金属基固定式或树脂基固定式)的存活率。根据PRISMA建议进行了系统评价,该评价先前已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为:CRD42024534183。检索在五个不同的数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science)中进行。此外还进行了手动数据库检索。从对这五个数据库的初步电子检索中,去除重复项后识别出72篇文章。阅读标题和摘要后,排除了46篇文章,共留下26项研究。阅读全文后,因不符合纳入标准又排除了15项,最终共有11篇文章纳入系统评价。这些研究中治疗的患者总数为479例,包括四项观察性研究和七项随机临床试验。固定间隙保持器,如带环和丝圈(BL)或舌弓(LA),因其长期稳定性和较低的丢失风险而更受青睐。相比之下,可摘保持器,如霍利保持器,适合临时使用,但需要患者更多的配合,耐受性可能也较差。间隙保持器有助于防止相邻牙齿移位,并避免未来需要进行更具侵入性的正畸治疗。此外,它们有助于咀嚼功能和语音发育。