Tian Sibo, Switchenko Jeffrey M, Cassidy Richard J, Escott Chase E, Castillo Richard, Patel Pretesh R, Curran Walter J, Higgins Kristin A
Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Feb;8(1):15-23. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2018.10.11.
Radiation pneumonitis is a common toxicity following lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We explored whether motion management technique, in conjunction with patient and treatment characteristics, is a predictor of radiation pneumonitis-free survival (PNFS).
A single institution multi-center lung SBRT database was retrospectively reviewed. PNFS was defined as time to earliest onset of radiation pneumonitis or last clinical follow-up. Patients were simulated using a 4-dimensional approach, and those with 1 cm or greater tumor motion were selected for respiratory-gated treatment. Real-time Position Management and phase-based gating were employed. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fit for relevant covariates to determine the impact of free-breathing versus respiratory-gated treatment on PNFS.
The initial treatment courses of 208 patients were included, with a median follow-up length of 23 months. The median age at treatment was 71 years. About 91.8% of patient had early stage (T1-2) non-small cell lung cancer and were treated with common regimens including 10 Gy ×5, 12 Gy ×4 and 18 Gy ×3; 26.4% underwent respiratory-gated SBRT. The overall rate of grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis was 10.1%. PNFS was not significantly different between patients treated with respiratory-gated versus free-breathing SBRT (HR =0.88; P=0.707); tumor location and fractionation were predictors of PNFS in the multivariate setting.
The method of motion management does not appear to impact PNFS when the tolerance for tumor displacement is 1 cm or less for free-breathing treatment planning and delivery. This approach may be appropriate when selecting patients for respiratory gating.
放射性肺炎是肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)后常见的毒性反应。我们探讨了运动管理技术结合患者及治疗特征是否可作为无放射性肺炎生存(PNFS)的预测指标。
对单机构多中心肺部SBRT数据库进行回顾性分析。PNFS定义为放射性肺炎最早发病时间或最后一次临床随访时间。采用四维方法对患者进行模拟,选择肿瘤运动1厘米或更大的患者进行呼吸门控治疗。采用实时位置管理和基于相位的门控技术。对相关协变量拟合单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型,以确定自由呼吸与呼吸门控治疗对PNFS的影响。
纳入208例患者的初始治疗疗程,中位随访时间为23个月。治疗时的中位年龄为71岁。约91.8%的患者患有早期(T1 - 2)非小细胞肺癌,接受了包括10 Gy×5、12 Gy×4和18 Gy×3等常见方案治疗;26.4%的患者接受了呼吸门控SBRT。3级或更高等级放射性肺炎的总体发生率为10.1%。呼吸门控SBRT治疗的患者与自由呼吸SBRT治疗的患者之间PNFS无显著差异(HR = 0.88;P = 0.707);在多变量分析中,肿瘤位置和分割方式是PNFS的预测指标。
当自由呼吸治疗计划和实施中肿瘤位移耐受度为1厘米或更小时,运动管理方法似乎不影响PNFS。在选择呼吸门控患者时,这种方法可能是合适的。