Hirata T, Tanigaki T, Kawase Y, Hirakawa A, Omori H, Okamoto S, Ota H, Sobue Y, Kikuchi J, Okubo M, Kamiya H, Kawasaki M, Suzuki T, Pijls N H J, Matsuo H
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gifu Heart Center, 4-14-4 Yabutaminami, Gifu city, 5008384, Gifu, Japan.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):142-149. doi: 10.1007/s12928-019-00579-9. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
Balloon occlusion is a potential method for inducing hyperemia to measure post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR). The objective of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of post-occlusional hyperemia. FFRs measured using post-occlusional hyperemia caused by 30 (FFR) and 60 s (FFR) of balloon occlusion after PCI were compared in 60 lesions from 60 patients. The duration of hyperemia was also measured. There was a strong correlation between FFR and FFR (r = 0.969, p < 0.01). The duration of hyperemia was significantly longer with FFR than with FFR (68 ± 23 vs. 37 ± 15 s, p < 0.01). The time required for pullback curve analysis was around 45 s. However, in 7 (12%) cases, the duration of hyperemia with FFR was < 45 s, which was not enough for pull-back curve analysis. To predict the duration of hyperemia with FFR ≥ 45 s, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 25 s of hyperemia with FFR. FFR is sufficient for diagnostic purposes. FFR is suitable for pull-back curve analysis in select cases based on predictions made using the duration of hyperemia with FFR.
球囊闭塞是一种诱导充血以测量经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后血流储备分数(FFR)的潜在方法。本研究的目的是确定闭塞后充血的临床实用性。在60例患者的60个病变中,比较了PCI后球囊闭塞30秒(FFR)和60秒(FFR)引起的闭塞后充血所测量的FFR。还测量了充血持续时间。FFR与FFR之间存在强相关性(r = 0.969,p < 0.01)。FFR时的充血持续时间明显长于FFR(68±23秒对37±15秒,p < 0.01)。回撤曲线分析所需时间约为45秒。然而,在7例(12%)病例中,FFR时的充血持续时间<45秒,这不足以进行回撤曲线分析。为了预测FFR≥45秒时的充血持续时间,受试者工作特征曲线分析显示FFR充血25秒的截断值。FFR足以用于诊断目的。基于使用FFR充血持续时间所做的预测,FFR在某些情况下适用于回撤曲线分析。