Xiao Yue, Li Tang-Fei
Yongchuan Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402160, China.
Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi. 2018 May 8;34(5):436-440. doi: 10.12047/j.cjap.5673.2018.099.
To compare the efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone in treating new-diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in monocycle, di-cycle, tri-cycle.
Divided by the ratio of 1:1:1, 93 newly diagnosed patients were randomly accepted monocycle (Group A:dexamethasone 40 mg once a day, from day1 to day4), dicycle (Group B:dexamethasone 40 mg once a day, from day 1 to day 4, day 15 to day 18), tri-cycle (Group C:dexamethasone 40 mg once a day, from day 1 to day 4, day 15 to day 18, day 29 to day 32) of high-dose dexamethasone treatment. Its efficacy and safety on the patients in three groups were compared.
Ninety-three newly patients with new-diagnosed ITP were divided into Group A, B, and C, 31 patients in each group. In terms of short-term benefits, there was no statistically significant difference among the 7th and 14th day complete response rate after end of treatment. However, there was statistically significant difference after the end of treatment on the 7th day response rate (41.9% 70.0% 90.0%, <0.01) and the 14th day response rate (16.1% 36.70% 63.3%, < 0.01); in terms of long-term benefits, there was no statistically significant difference among the 120-day response rate, the complete response rate within the treatment on the 60th, 90th and 120th day and the relapse rate at 90th and 120th day; however, there was statistically significant difference among the 60- day response rate (10.0% 26.6% 53.3%, <0.01), 90-day(0.0% 13.3% 30.0%, <0.01) and 60-day relapse rate(88.9% 73.3% 46.7%, <0.01). Mostly of the treatment-related adverse reactions in the three groups were mild, and most patients are tolerable.
Although the complete response rate of ITP patients did not improved by increasing the cycle of high-dose dexamethasone, but improved response rate in three months, and adverse reactions were tolerable, which could be used as a reference for clinical use.
比较大剂量地塞米松单疗程、双疗程、三疗程治疗新诊断原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的疗效及安全性。
将93例新诊断患者按1:1:1比例随机接受单疗程(A组:地塞米松40mg,每日1次,第1天至第4天)、双疗程(B组:地塞米松40mg,每日1次,第1天至第4天,第15天至第18天)、三疗程(C组:地塞米松40mg,每日1次,第1天至第4天,第15天至第18天,第29天至第32天)大剂量地塞米松治疗。比较三组患者的疗效及安全性。
93例新诊断ITP患者分为A、B、C组,每组31例。短期疗效方面,治疗结束后第7天和第14天的完全缓解率差异无统计学意义。但治疗结束后第7天的有效率(41.9% 70.0% 90.0%,P<0.01)和第14天的有效率(16.1% 36.70% 63.3%,P<0.01)差异有统计学意义;长期疗效方面,120天有效率、治疗第60天、90天和120天内的完全缓解率以及第90天和120天的复发率差异无统计学意义;但第60天有效率(10.0% 26.6% 53.3%,P<0.01)、第90天有效率(0.0% 13.3% 30.0%,P<0.01)和第60天复发率(88.9% 73.3% 46.7%,P<0.01)差异有统计学意义。三组治疗相关不良反应大多为轻度,多数患者可耐受。
虽然增加大剂量地塞米松疗程未提高ITP患者的完全缓解率,但提高了三个月内的有效率,且不良反应可耐受,可供临床用药参考。