• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器人摄像头固定器(FreeHand)进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。

Use of a robotic camera holder (FreeHand) for laparoscopic appendicectomy.

作者信息

Mittal Rohin, Sbaih Mohammed, Motson Roger W, Arulampalam Tan

机构信息

Colchester Hospital University Foundation Trust, Colchester, United Kingdom.

ICENI Centre for Surgical Education, Colchester General Hospital, Colchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020 Feb;29(1):56-60. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1576052. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1080/13645706.2019.1576052
PMID:30789101
Abstract

Use of a mechanical arm to hold the laparoscopic camera has many advantages. FreeHand (FreeHand Ltd, Guildford, United Kingdom) is a robotic camera holder which uses head movement and infrared technology. This trial assessed the usefulness of FreeHand in laparoscopic appendicectomy. This was a single center prospective cohort study on patients undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy using FreeHand. Patient demographics, operative details, conversion to human camera holder and surgeon discomfort were recorded. Utilization of assistant time while not assisting was also recorded. Twenty-two participants were included, with a mean age of 32 years and a mean BMI of 25.3. The mean set up time was nine minutes. There were five conversions to a manual camera holder (22.7%). There were 22 lens cleaning episodes with nine (40.9%) not requiring any lens cleaning and six (27.3%) requiring one clean. There were no peri-operative complications. Most surgeons reported minimal or no discomfort. Assistant's time was used for ward work (57%), clerking patients (36%) and for a break (7%). FreeHand can be safely used in laparoscopic appendicectomy. It provides a stable image, puts the surgeon in control of the surgical field, causes minimal user discomfort, and frees up personnel.

摘要

使用机械臂握持腹腔镜摄像头有诸多优点。FreeHand(英国吉尔福德的FreeHand有限公司)是一种利用头部运动和红外技术的机器人摄像头固定器。本试验评估了FreeHand在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的实用性。这是一项针对使用FreeHand进行急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究。记录了患者人口统计学资料、手术细节、转换为人工摄像头固定器的情况以及外科医生的不适感。还记录了助手在不提供协助时的时间利用情况。纳入了22名参与者,平均年龄为32岁,平均体重指数为25.3。平均设置时间为9分钟。有5例转换为手动摄像头固定器(22.7%)。有22次镜头清洁情况,其中9次(40.9%)不需要任何镜头清洁,6次(27.3%)需要一次清洁。没有围手术期并发症。大多数外科医生报告极少或没有不适感。助手的时间用于病房工作(57%)、接待患者(36%)和休息(7%)。FreeHand可安全用于腹腔镜阑尾切除术。它能提供稳定的图像,使外科医生能够掌控手术视野,引起的使用者不适感最小,并能腾出人员。

相似文献

1
Use of a robotic camera holder (FreeHand) for laparoscopic appendicectomy.使用机器人摄像头固定器(FreeHand)进行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020 Feb;29(1):56-60. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1576052. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic colectomy with and without the aid of a robotic camera holder.使用和不使用机器人摄像头固定器辅助的腹腔镜结肠切除术的比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Feb;12(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00008.
3
Rate of skill acquisition in the use of a robotic laparoscope holder (FreeHand(®)).使用机器人腹腔镜固定器(FreeHand(®))时的技能习得率。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016 Aug;25(4):196-202. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1182031. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery?机器人摄像头辅助:腹腔镜和胸腔镜手术的未来?
Surg Innov. 2018 Oct;25(5):485-491. doi: 10.1177/1553350618784224. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
5
Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy.独立式机械臂摄像固定系统评估:改善腹腔镜技术的新科技
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Mar;31(3):404-409. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1806078. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
New release of the Boonpong laparoscopic camera holder.Boonpong腹腔镜摄像头固定器新品发布。
Aust N Z J Surg. 1999 Feb;69(2):141-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01491.x.
7
Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial.手持和机器人辅助摄像控制中的工效学:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3919-3925. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06678-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Comparison of robotic camera holders with human assistants in endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人摄像持镜臂与人类助手在内镜手术中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2023 Aug;32(4):153-162. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2023.2199332. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
9
Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Joystick-Guided Robotic Scope Holder Compared to That of Human Scopists: A Prospective Trial.评估操纵杆引导式机器人镜管持镜器与人工持镜者的效率:一项前瞻性试验。
Surg Innov. 2023 Oct;30(5):564-570. doi: 10.1177/15533506231157039. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
10
Comparison of FreeHand robot-assisted with human-assisted laparoscopic fundoplication.徒手机器人辅助与人工辅助腹腔镜胃底折叠术的比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jan;31(1):24-27. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1771373. Epub 2020 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Application and exploration of surgical assistive arms in thoracoscopic surgery: a single-center retrospective study.手术辅助臂在胸腔镜手术中的应用与探索:一项单中心回顾性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 15;15(1):5606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89897-y.
2
Combining brain-computer interfaces with deep reinforcement learning for robot training: a feasibility study in a simulation environment.将脑机接口与深度强化学习相结合用于机器人训练:在模拟环境中的可行性研究。
Front Neuroergon. 2023 Nov 23;4:1274730. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1274730. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparison of Single-Person Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a Novel Brace-Assisted Camera Holding System and Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Neural Network Algorithm Analysis.
新型 Brace 辅助持镜系统下单人腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:神经网络算法分析。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Sep 19;2022:5915670. doi: 10.1155/2022/5915670. eCollection 2022.
4
Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.机器人在紧急普通外科手术中的应用:系统综述。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):275-290. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01425-6. Epub 2022 Jun 21.