Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute.
Department of Mathematics and Statistics.
Melanoma Res. 2019 Dec;29(6):635-642. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000582.
Ipilimumab is an anti-CTLA4 monoclonal antibody with demonstrated efficacy for metastatic melanoma in randomized controlled trials, including in the first-line setting. Population-based outcomes directly compared with historic chemotherapy treatment in metastatic or unresectable melanoma are lacking. Using population-based data from the province of Ontario, the benefit of first-line ipilimumab was estimated by comparing outcomes of patients treated with first-line dacarbazine over the period 2007-2009 with patients treated over the period 2010-2015 with first-line ipilimumab. Cutaneous and noncutaneous cases were included. The administrative data set utilized was high-dimensional; meaning, there was a large number of variables relative to the sample size. To adjust for important confounders among the many available variables, we utilized a double-selection method, a modified machine learning algorithm to extract the important variables that were related to both survival times and treatment usage. Time-dependent treatment modeling was utilized. Among the 2793 melanoma patients receiving palliative treatment (systemic therapy, surgery, or radiation) in Ontario (2007-2015), there were 289 patients treated with first-line ipilimumab (2010-2015) and 175 patients treated with first-line dacarbazine (2007-2009). For first-line ipilimumab, the adjusted hazard ratio compared with dacarbazine for overall survival (OS) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.84) with a 1-year survival of 46.5 versus 18.9% with dacarbazine. In subgroup analysis, ipilimumab was associated with improved OS across groups (age, sex, comorbidity, income quintile, previous interferon). First-line ipilimumab was found to have a significant OS benefit compared with historical controls in a population including those patients not routinely included in clinical trials. The treatment effect was similar to randomized controlled trials, suggesting a meaningful benefit when utilized in a population-based setting.
依匹单抗是一种抗 CTLA-4 单克隆抗体,在随机对照试验中已被证明对转移性黑色素瘤有效,包括一线治疗。在转移性或不可切除性黑色素瘤中,缺乏与历史化疗治疗直接比较的基于人群的结局数据。利用安大略省的基于人群的数据,通过比较 2007-2009 年接受一线达卡巴嗪治疗的患者与 2010-2015 年接受一线依匹单抗治疗的患者的结局,来估计一线依匹单抗的疗效。包括皮肤和非皮肤病例。所使用的行政数据集是高维的;也就是说,相对于样本量,有大量的变量。为了调整许多可用变量中重要的混杂因素,我们利用了一种双重选择方法,即一种改进的机器学习算法,以提取与生存时间和治疗使用都相关的重要变量。利用时间依赖性治疗建模。在安大略省接受姑息治疗(系统治疗、手术或放疗)的 2793 名黑色素瘤患者中,有 289 名患者接受一线依匹单抗治疗(2010-2015 年),175 名患者接受一线达卡巴嗪治疗(2007-2009 年)。对于一线依匹单抗,与达卡巴嗪相比,总生存期(OS)的调整后的危险比为 0.63(95%置信区间:0.47-0.84),1 年生存率为 46.5%,而达卡巴嗪为 18.9%。在亚组分析中,依匹单抗与各组(年龄、性别、合并症、收入五分位数、先前干扰素)的 OS 改善相关。与历史对照相比,在包括那些通常不包括在临床试验中的患者的人群中,一线依匹单抗被发现具有显著的 OS 获益。该治疗效果与随机对照试验相似,表明在基于人群的环境中使用时具有有意义的获益。