Suppr超能文献

挽救性根治性前列腺切除术与一线放疗或高强度聚焦超声治疗复发性局限性前列腺癌的疗效比较:一项多中心研究的结果。

Outcomes after salvage radical prostatectomy and first-line radiation therapy or HIFU for recurrent localized prostate cancer: results from a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83 bvd hospital, 75013, Paris, France.

Department of Medical Oncology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013, Paris, France.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2019 Aug;37(8):1491-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02683-0. Epub 2019 Feb 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite no consensus on the optimal management of recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation or HIFU therapy, salvage prostatectomy (sRP) is reserved for only 3% of patients because of technical challenges and frequent post-operative complications. We assessed outcomes after sRP in a series of patients with localized PCa and that had received radiation therapy or HIFU as a first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from nine French referral centers on patients treated with sRP between 2005 and 2017 were collected. Pre- and post-operative data, including oncological and functional outcomes after first treatment and sRP, were analyzed to determine the predictors for biochemical recurrence (BCR) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after sRP.

RESULTS

First-line treatments were external beam-radiation therapy (EBRT) for 30 (55%), brachytherapy (BT) for 10 (18%), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for 15 (27%). Median (IQR) PSA at diagnosis was 6.4 (4.9-9.5) ng/mL, median PSA at nadir was 1.9 (0.7-3.0) ng/mL, and median (IQR) to first BCR was 13 (6-20) months. Of the 55 patients, 44 (80%) received robot-assisted salvage radical prostatectomy and 11 (20%) received salvage retropubic radical prostatectomy. Restoration of continence was achieved in 90% of preoperatively continent patients; 24% that had received nerve-sparing (NS) procedures were potent after surgery. Prolonged catheterization due to anastomotic leakage was the most common complication. Age, preoperative clinical stage, NS procedure, and a pathological Gleason score were predictors for BCR.

CONCLUSIONS

sRP was safe, feasible, and effective using either an open or robot-assisted approach, in experienced hands. Age, preoperative clinical stage, NS procedure, and pathological GS were linked with BCR after sRP.

摘要

介绍

尽管对于原发性放射治疗或 HIFU 治疗后复发性前列腺癌的最佳治疗方法尚无共识,但由于技术挑战和频繁的术后并发症,仅将挽救性前列腺切除术(sRP)保留给 3%的患者。我们评估了一系列接受过放射治疗或 HIFU 作为一线治疗的局限性前列腺癌患者接受 sRP 后的结果。

材料和方法

收集了 2005 年至 2017 年间在 9 个法国转诊中心接受 sRP 治疗的患者的数据。分析了术前和术后数据,包括首次治疗和 sRP 后的肿瘤学和功能结果,以确定 sRP 后生化复发(BCR)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)的预测因素。

结果

一线治疗为外照射放射治疗(EBRT)30 例(55%),近距离放射治疗(BT)10 例(18%),高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)15 例(27%)。诊断时中位(IQR)PSA 为 6.4(4.9-9.5)ng/ml,最低 PSA 为 1.9(0.7-3.0)ng/ml,首次 BCR 中位数(IQR)为 13(6-20)个月。在 55 例患者中,44 例(80%)接受机器人辅助挽救性根治性前列腺切除术,11 例(20%)接受挽救性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术。90%术前有控尿能力的患者恢复了控尿能力;24%接受神经保留(NS)手术的患者术后有能力。吻合口漏致导尿时间延长是最常见的并发症。年龄、术前临床分期、NS 手术和病理 Gleason 评分是 BCR 的预测因素。

结论

在有经验的医生手中,无论是开放还是机器人辅助的方法,sRP 都是安全、可行和有效的。年龄、术前临床分期、NS 手术和病理 GS 与 sRP 后 BCR 相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验